Senate asked to probe NIA privatization deal



MANILA, Philippines—The National Irrigation Administration (NIA) stands to lose some P114 million a year in revenues when it implements a highly questionable contract that privatizes the operations of its Baligatan mini-hydropower plant in Ramon town, Isabela, documents received by the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee have showed.

In their letter complaints, several Isabela irrigators and employees of the NIA-Magat River Integrated Irrigation System (Mariis) called on Senator Teofisto Guingona III, committee chairman, to immediately call for an investigation on the contract stipulating that NIA would hand over to a private company—Maslog 1 Hydropower Corp.—the management and operation of the Baligatan plant.

The complaint said the terms and conditions of the contract were deemed “grossly disadvantageous to the government while unduly benefitting those who will be managing and operating the plant.”

The six-megawatt Baligatan hydropower plant is a key component of NIA-Mariis which irrigates some 7,000 hectares of prime farmlands in Region 2. It produces 30 gigawatt-hours of electricity a year.

It is also one of the major earners in the irrigation system and is estimated to bring in P120 million in power revenues to the NIA.

Among the documents submitted to the committee were a copy of the memorandum of agreement dated June 14, 2012, and a copy of the memorandum of agreement dated April 12, 2012, between NIA and Maslog 1.

Both documents were signed by NIA Administrator Antonio Nangel and Maslog 1 president Diego Picardo.

Nangel could not be reached for comment as of press time on Thursday because he was reportedly attending a National Economic and Development Authority board meeting. His information officer refused to comment on the complaint.

The complaint questioned the urgency and need to put the plant under the management of a private company. It said there was really no need to privatize the operations of the plant.

The complainants said there was adequate funding from the national government for the operation of the entire Magat irrigation system, NIA’s second largest irrigation network.

A total of P30 billion in rehabilitation and repair funds were allocated recently to the NIA for the improvement of irrigation systems including Mariis.

No public bidding

The complaint also alleged that the NIA-Maslog 1 deal was anomalous because there was no board approval for it. NIA officials also allegedly violated the law when it awarded the management and operation contract of the power plant to a private company without public bidding.

At the very least, Maslog 1’s proposal to manage and operate Baligatan should have been subject to a so-called “Swiss challenge” under the Build-Operate-Transfer law and the Renewable Energy Act, the complaint said.

In the contract, NIA will receive five percent of the yearly gross revenues generated out of the operation of the plant which will be fully taken over by Maslog 1. This means NIA will be receiving about P6 million a year as its share in the operations of the power plant.

“Why would NIA agree to receive P6 million a year under the privatization contract when it generates P120 million a year if it operates the plant itself?” the complaint said.

“But what makes the transaction criminal is that the private contractor would just be taking over a fully functional and well-equipped government facility without putting in much in investments, then raking in millions of pesos in revenue. Niluto sa sariling mantika ang NIA, (NIA is being fried in its own lard),” the complaint said.

The complaint also pointed to a supposedly irregular part of the contract that appeared to benefit some NIA officials who are set to retire soon. The provision in Article 2 No. 18 of the contract commits Maslog 1 “to recognize a special purpose company that may be created to operate and maintain the power plant.”

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Horst Manure

    Move in strip all the assets then claim its not viable and move on for the taxpayer to put it back together, just another ponzi style scheme, like the Paris water board con.

  • PH2011

    The farmers association should be heard by the Senate. They are directly
    affected by the privatization, they are the end users. Irrigation water is not
    free, they pay for it every harvest ( there’s a proposal during Erap time to
    have it FOC, but I’m not sure if that materialized/approved by Congress).

    Privatization started in NAPOCOR, but this was back by congress under
    EPIRA Law. I’m not sure if these NIA officials using the same law to privatize
    the government infrastructure. Swiss challenge” under the
    Build-Operate-Transfer law an“d the Renewable Energy Act,might sanctioned by
    this Law.Take note that this structure is multi-purpose, both Power and

    Well, to cut it short. They are not interested in irrigation.

    Private investors are more interested in POWER… Well, It produces 30
    gigawatt-hours of electricity a year. Power is money.

    Corruption in privatization of government natural resources is still  on the max. The government repair, rehab and
    upgrade in billions pesos, then a private concessioner take over. A recent news
    stated, that the Aquino government approved the billion peso budget for the repair/upgrde
    of Angat Dam. Don’t be surprise, if sooner or later that will be also privatized.

    TO QUOTE THE COMPLAINATS: “But what makes the transaction criminal is
    that the private contractor would just be taking over a fully functional and
    well-equipped government facility without putting in much in investments, then
    raking in millions of pesos in revenue. Niluto sa sariling mantika ang NIA,
    (NIA is being fried in its own lard),” the complaint said.

    I salute the farmers (complainants),” mas alam nila ang nagyayari kesa
    sa mga legislators”.


  • kismaytami

    I thought wala nang wangwangers under aquino admin. Let’s see what’s the palace dimwits will do about this.

  • joboni96

    best kept secret government scam

    sell assets and
    get commission

    buy replacements and
    get commission again

    kaya kontrolado na tayo
    ng intsik switik at
    dummies ng dayuhang intsik switik mvp

    happy naman si corrupt government official
    dala ang komisyon sa u.s. at abroad
    sitting pretty

    just see the list of
    government official green card holders
    and with u.s. visas

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos