Quantcast
pope ph

Home amid Chinese highway a symbol of resistance



People stand near a house which sits in the middle of a newly built road in Wenling city in east China’s Zhejiang province on November 22. AP

BEIJING—In the middle of an eastern Chinese city’s new main road, rising incongruously from a huge circle in the freshly laid pavement, is a five-story row house with ragged edges. This is the home of the duck farmer who said “no.”

Luo Baogen and his wife are the lone holdouts from a neighborhood that was demolished to make way for the main thoroughfare heading to a newly built railway station on the outskirts of the city of Wenling in Zhejiang province.

Dramatic images of Luo’s home have circulated widely online in China this week, becoming the latest symbol of resistance in the frequent standoffs between Chinese homeowners and local officials accused of offering too little compensation to vacate neighborhoods for major redevelopment projects.

There’s even a name for the buildings that remain standing as their owners resist development. They are called “nail houses” because the homeowners refuse to be hammered down.

Nail house families occasionally have resorted to violence. Some homeowners have even set themselves on fire in protests. Often, they keep 24-hour vigils because developers will shy away from bulldozing homes when people are inside.

Xiayangzhang village chief Chen Xuecai said in a telephone interview Friday that city planners decided that Luo’s village of 1,600 had to be moved for a new business district anchored by the train station. Chen said most families agreed to government-offered compensation in 2007.

Luo, 67, and a handful of neighbors in other parts of the new district are holding out for more.

“We want a new house on a two-unit lot with simple interior decoration,” Luo told local reporters Thursday in video footage forwarded to The Associated Press.

Luo had just completed his house at a cost of about 600,000 yuan ($95,000) when the government first approached him with their standard offer of 220,000 ($35,000) to move out — which he refused, Chen said. The offer has since gone up to 260,000 yuan ($41,000).

“The Luo family is not rich,” Chen said, acknowledging that they can ill afford such a big loss on their home. “But the policy is what it is.”

The new road to the railroad station was completed in recent weeks, and has not yet been opened for traffic.

What is unusual in Luo’s case is that his house has been allowed to stand for so long. It is common for local authorities in China to take extreme measures, such as cutting off utilities or moving in to demolish when residents are out for the day.

Luo told local reporters his electricity and water are still flowing, and that he and his wife sleep in separate parts of the home to deter any partial demolition.

Deputy village chief Luo Xuehua — a cousin to the duck farmer — said he didn’t expect the dispute to go on much longer. He said he expects Luo Baogen to reach an agreement with the government soon, though he said the homeowner’s demands are unrealistic.

“We cannot just give whatever he demands,” Luo Xuehua said. “That’s impossible.”


Follow Us


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: China , development , Nail House , protest , real estate


  • pepito gwaps

    Very admirable courage of ordinary man. Here in the Philippines we are fighting for our inherint islands from china and we will not give up too.!!!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BL2GYU35SO6HTJUEAUTXS3QFYM George Lapulapu

    no right of way in China? LOL

    but very nice symbol of resistance…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_U62PHGMKO4RK7BLMC4ACA4EG5A EREC

    HUWAG PO KAYONG MANIWALA DITO, itoy isang propaganda lamang ng communistang china.

    Marami po akong napanood na dokumentaryo (underground media correspondence of well know TV media) that the communist china practiced land grabbing….. kahit nga pong palay na madali nang anihin talagang sinisira nila sa pamamagitan heavy equipment pag hindi ibinibigay ng may ari para lang maipatayo ng communistang china ang proyektong pangkalsada…. or urban development projects.

    Ito ay isang malaking panglilinlang….last week lang ipinakita ito sa international media. Kung naalala pa ninyo may isa pa nito na hinuhukay ang paligid ng bahay dahil hindi rin daw pumayag yong may ari.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZWTTKJTI57YO7TZBJC66GA2OLU dennis

    Take note of this! It can resemble as a good topic for “Human Rights”!…LOL! Do we think that there is an Insurance Company that will protect the owner just in case something happen?

  • virgoyap

    So a kind of protest such as this can be done even in communist China. Who said that Chinese government don’t respect human rights? ha ha ha

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZWTTKJTI57YO7TZBJC66GA2OLU dennis

    How can a Communist rule country allowed this things to happen? Sa isang demokrasyang bansa eh pwede pa!…I think this is just a hoax!

  • akramgolteb

    Maraming ganito sa China. Isang katatawanan lang ito para sa maraming instik pag nakikita nila. Paalisin din ito pag tagal. Baka may kamaganak sa gobyerno sila kaya hindi pinaalis agad. Marami na akong nakitang pinalayas na buong barangay gamit ng gobyerno ay mga 50 truck ng sundalo naka full riot gear at may sukbit na long firearm pero nakapagtataka paminsan minsan may mga ganito na pinababayaan. Pag binuksan na ang kalsada, yari na itong bahay na ito at ang may ari. 

  • buttones

    It is NOT a sign of resistance, it is rather more a recognition of peoples rights and this is China for God’s sake! Had they no regard for rights they would have destroyed this property-

  • poltergeist_fuhrer

    communists are really stuupid!!!

  • divictes

    Pakulo lang ‘to. Baka ang tunay na may-ari nagpapala’t piko na sa Re-education Camps.



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace
Advertisement