Quantcast
pork barrel

Pro-RH bill solon tweets disgust over House leader’s ‘politicking’

By |


Pangasinan Representative Kimi Cojuangco. Photo from https://twitter.com/kimicojuangco

MANILA, Philippines — Pangasinan Representative Kimi Cojuangco went to Twitter and accused Majority leader Neptali Gonzales II at the House of Representatives of saying that there was no chance that the Reproductive Health Bill would be passed in the 15th Congress.

In a “public confession”, Cojuangco quoted Gonzales as saying, “Wala na yan; forget the RH Bill. If ever, baka sa 16th Congress na lang. We can just repackage it”.

She said that she asked the majority floor leader, in a meeting, to tell her the truth on the fate of House Bill 4244 otherwise known as the RH Bill.

“I started by saying I am tired of fighting to death. I go to every single interview and do what I can to get this bill passed. So I pleaded with him to please tell me the truth,” twitted the legislator.

Cojuangco said she was “flabbergasted” at Gonzales’ reply, adding that she then felt that the House leader had just been leading along Albay Representative Edcel Lagman, the main proponent of the RH Bill.

“Why are you leading Manong Edcel along? Why are you saying something different in front of Speaker Belmonte?”

She said that she kept it to herself for some time but decided to make it public after Wednesday’s heated exchange with Gonzales.

The majority floor leader told reporters he had no idea what Cojuangco had for breakfast when she went on her tirade about the House leadership deliberately delaying the RH Bill.

He advised the legislator to “keep her mouth shut”, apparently irked by Cojuangco who said that she “couldn’t handle this blatant politicking anymore. No way will I keep quiet.”

“We are all being brought for a ‘ride’ by such trapo style politics. So there, the truth is out,” she said.

“If this means that I should not be a member of the HOR (House of Representatives), ok lang sa akin,” she added.

Gonzales told reporters in a chance interview Wednesday that he preferred issues like this to be straightened out within the plenary and not on social networking websites like Twitter.

This time, though, he refused to comment on Cojuangco’s recent tweets.


Follow Us




Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Politics , Rep. Kimi Cojuangco , Rep. Neptali Gonzales , RH bill , Twitter


  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OHOD5EA75DBBUH53UKLRXRK764 Mang Teban

    She should not bring her case at social networking sites. This is immaturity even if the House Majority Leader had actually confided to her his view. That, Madam Legislator, is something between you and him, if you are telling the truth.

    Anyway, bring the matter inside Congress. Have you not been oriented on what is proper conduct as a “distinguished member of the House”? Rep. Kimi Cojuangco, you are not in a neighborhood association where you can tell all the neighbors your gripes.

    • mumbaki ak

      damaso in action

      • boypalaban

        gawain ni damaso yung magpa-pansin habang may nangyayaring religious ceremony…

        si damaso na kung ano anong kabulastugan ang sinasabi sa mga turista diyan sa intramuros…

        no to DAMASO !

      • mumbaki ak

        tarsier ka ata boy bawang..iuwi mo na ang suka at masusunog ang ulam nyo

      • boypalaban

        di ako gumagamit ng suka sa ulam…mas gusto kong pansahog ang condom at pills na pinamimigay ng mga proRh lalo sa mga mamamatay na sa gutom…

      • mumbaki ak

        ah..dun mo pala ginagamit yun..kaya nagkaganyan utak mo. pa-operate ka na.bka barado na tyan mo ng condom.

      • boypalaban

        nahawa lang ako sa gaya mong proRH…kaya nga ayaw ko matulad sa atin ang mga mahihirap at kababaihan…utak condom!

      • txtman

        UYYYY

        SI KOMIKS WRITER RIZAL

        ANDRES BONIFACIO SHOULD BE THE NATIONAL HERO

        PITIFUL

      • txtman

        KIMI TSISMOSA

        AHIHIHIHIHIHIHHIHIHIHIHI

        PITIFUL

    • justjarred

       And why should she not bring her case to networking sites? She’s just telling the people of what is really happening inside the House.

      • txtman

        KASI NGA

        PARA SIYANG ISANG WA-CLASS NA TSISMOSA

        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        YAN ANG TINATAWAG NA SPOILED BRAT

        AKALA NIYA, MAKAKA-BLACK MAIL SIYA

        YAN TULOY

        NAGING TSISMOSANG WALANG KACLASS-CLASS

        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        PITIFUL

    • joshmale2004

      And who is paying the Salary and Pork barrel of Neptali Gonzales? Besides, their conversation did not happen in a plenary session but rather as a private meeting. The public should have all the right to know the real score.

      • txtman

        ANO YUN ULIT?

        IN PRIVATE MEETING

        GUYS, BE CAREFUL KAY KIMI TSISMOSA

        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        BLACKMAIL ANG TAWAG DYAN INENG

        A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF A SPOILED BRAT TSISMOSA

        KIMI TSISMOSA

        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        PITIFUL

      • joshmale2004

        NONSENSE. Maghanap ka na lang ng ka level mo to discuss with. Di ka pwede sa intelligent discussion. pweh.

      • txtman

        KIMI TSISMOSA

        AHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI

        PITIFUL

    • txtman

      YAN ANG TINATAWAG NA WALANG CLASS

      NAKAKAHIYA

      COJUANGCO PA MAN DIN

      WALANG KACLASS-CLASS

      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      ILANG PAKETENG CONDOM KAYA BINIBIGAY NIYA SA DRIVER/SECURITY NIYA?

      YOUR GUESS IS AS GOOD AS MINE

      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      PITIFUL

      • boypalaban

        parang magiging proRH ako sa sinulat mo na yan ah…kung ganyang hot ba naman ang magsu-supply ng condom…at….
        in fairness mukhang hot mama nga talaga siya…

      • marionics

        he he he i like how you think boy. pero sabi ko nga e medyo di na gaanong hot yang si mama kimi. baka lumang larawan na yang ginamit he he

      • boypalaban

         medyo nagtutugma ba tayo sa ganitong “aspeto”? he he he

      • marionics

        dati pa pre. kaya nga tayo magka vibes e he he

      • boypalaban

        oo nga e…napapansin ko rin…

  • Lakan Dupil

    Ilista mo na lang Cong. Cojuangco ang lahat ng humahadlang sa RH Bill at ilabas din sa lahat ng social networking site at ipakita ang lakas ng mga Pro RH sa nalalapit na election. Hindi ka na nasanay kay Neptali..hunyango din yan katulad ng majority sa lower house…

    • txtman

      DI SIGE, ILABAS NINYO

      TINGIN BA NINYO IBOBOTO NILA MGA CANDIDATES NINYO DAHIL
          PRO-RH SILA?

      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      IN YOUR DREAMS

      PITIFUL

      • Lakan Dupil

        Tingnan natin…HAR HAR HAR janitor ka siguro ni Neptali no HA HA HA

        2012/11/22 Disqus

  • http://alasfilipinas.blogspot.com/ Pepe Alas

    Yes! Yes! Delay that stupid bill! Yes! Ipasá na lang yan sa 357,867 na congreso, ¡hehehe!

  • joshmale2004

    Are we sure the vast cash machinery of Vatican has not reached our congress?

    • boypalaban

      talo ba ng pera ng Vatican ang pork barrel?

      • joshmale2004

        Hindi naman pero pera din naman yan lol.

      • txtman

        KIMI TSISMOSA

        AHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI

        PITIFUL

      • txtman

        KIMI TSISMOSA

        AHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI

        PITIFUL

    • prince_janus

      Magbibigay ba ng pera ang Vatican? o ang mga Pilipino ang magbibigay ng pera sa Vatican?

      • joshmale2004

        Both. Yung binibigay nating pera sa church, naka remit yan sa Vatican. Ang Vatican, may mga lobbyist yan sa iba ibang countries to protect the catholic hierarchy’s interests sa mga law makers ng bawat bansa.

      • boypalaban

        paano mo naman nalaman…
        di kasi ako katoliko…pwede ba pakibanggit dito na nagpapatunay na nire-remit nga ang pera na abuloy sa simbahan papunta sa vatican…please lang…

    • north pole

      one thing is sure, the cash machinery of big pharmaceutical companies who will benefit on the RH bill’s passage is on the works, in addition to that of pro-abortion foreign organizations who sees their aging and diminishing population relying on people from third world nations for support and care as dangerous.

      • joshmale2004

        Off course. Business matters will always be present with this Bill as well as every law that starts to exist. But this is for a different side of the paradigm. On the other hand as individuals especially most of the oposers of this bill which are predominantly males, we should also understand the need for equal protection and health demands for our women especially for our wife if we truly love them. What would a husband do if her wife has a medical condition that she can not afford another pregnancy but requested you that she wants to maintain your loving sexual activities to continue so she asked you that you use contraceptives for both your pleasure without risking pregnancy? Will you not acceed to her request just since we have a negative position on the RH Bill? I think this is hypocrisy.

      • north pole

        your other side of paradigm is a straw man to deviate from your business’ ends.

        even without the RH bill, couples can have sex without risking pregnancy although the woman partner have that medical condition you mentioned. will you guarantee us with your life that if the RH bill is passed, these people you mentioned will not suffer anymore? if you will not, that is hypocrisy.

  • boypalaban

     pwede pa si hot mama Kimi…

    • burubudongstongstoings

      di mo ba pansin na halos lahat ng lawmakers na gusto ang RH ay mga babae dahil alam nila ano ang mabuti para sa kanila, di tulad ng mga lalaki at tulad mo na puro lang libog nasa isip…

      • boypalaban

        ang malilibog yung ayaw ng pagiging responsable sa sex…basta may condom at contraceptives ayos na…kahit walang manufacturer ang nagsasabi na 100% safe yan sa STD at pregnancy…

        babae ba si edcel lagman na may pitong anak?
        babae ba si tsuping lacson?
        babae ba lalong lalo na ang idolo mong si pnoy? medyo lang siguro…fafa…

        ang malilibog yung ayaw pangatawanan kung yayari…yari lang nang yari…yun ang malilibog…at overdose ang utak sa condom…

      • marionics

        hay naku boy alam kong pareho tayo ng karanasan na ang mga babae ang malakas mangalabit sa atin, di ba chong? he he

      • WeAry_Bat

         baka pwedeng sumali?  Game and Watch, narinig ko sa kumpare ko…

        Game sila, watch ako.  mabait na kasi.

      • marionics

        he he game and watch ha? grabe napaka lumang reference niyan dre

      • boypalaban

         may laro pang octopus, popeye,etc…

      • boypalaban

        oo nga e…daming nangangalabit sa akin sa avenida…”sir, short time”…

      • marionics

        meron ba sa avenida? qc kasi ako e kaya q ave ang alam ko he he

      • boypalaban

        dati hanggang ngayon…pero nyek!
        medyo may class yung mga nasa BGC…

      • marionics

        BGC?

      • http://twitter.com/akongednamzug akongednamzug

        Pero brod kailangan mo rin ng condom, mukhang manyakis ka, pangontra sa AIDS ba.

      • boypalaban

        paano mo nalaman na manyakis ako?
        type mo ba akong tikman?
        anytime basta may pera ka…at kahit lamang ka lang ng konti kay hot mama…at sana di ka magnanakaw ng lakas…

      • batangsulpok

        Marami kasing Pilipino ay ayaw ng may condom dahil ang katwiran nila ay parang kumakain ng saging na may balat, kung baga, di raw nalalasap ang sarap.

    • marionics

      nakita ko na sa personal yan boy medyo di na gaanong hot he he

      • boypalaban

         well…basta makinis…pwede pa rin….

      • marionics

        e yun na nga boy, medyo dehin na gaano makinis chong. mas matanda siyang tignan keysa kay mark conjuangco na mister niya he he

      • boypalaban

        kakikita ko lang sa Googol…kahit si Vecky Bilo mahihirapan na siyang retokihin…ayoto na….

  • txtman

    ELECTION NA TALAGA!

    NAKAILANG EXPOSURE NA SI KIEME-KIEME AH

    MAGKANO KAYA BINAYAD NIYA SA PUBLICITY?

    PINILI PA TALAGA ANG PACUTE NIYANG PICTURE HA

    PITIFUL

    • mumbaki ak

      sira ba talaga ang keyboard mo? o papansin ka lang masyado?

      • boypalaban

         pinansin mo naman…

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        Engot na kasi ang taong hindi makakapansin. harharhar

  • prince_janus

    Oh ayan na! Lumabas rin ang katotohanan! Di pa rin yan ma-approve! Baka sa 100th Congress na yan. Puro gimik lang to lahat para may pag-usapan. Hahaaay, dapat masanay na tayo lahat sa kung anong meron sa mga pulitiko natin.

    Ikaw naman Congresswoman Kimi Dora, huwag lang dito sa social networking sites magdadaldal. Labanan mo silang lahat sa balitaktakan sa plenaryo para sisikat ka sa buong bansa. Ngayon ko lang narinig pangalan mo eh.

    • luzviminda88

      BWA HA HA HA. SIGE MGA KAMPON KO. IPAGLABAN ANG ATING KAHARIAN DITO SA IMPIYERNO AT MAY PREMYO KAYONG MALAMIG NA LUNGGA NA PAGTULUGAN BASTA KALABANIN ANG MGA ANTI RH BILL. DAPAT MAKONTROL NATIN ANG POPULASYON AT MAGWAGI ANG KORUPSIYON NG PUNDO NG PILIPINAS KAY BANAT PA AKING MAGIGITING NA ALIPORES. B WA HA HA HA HA

  • txtman

    >>>>>>>>>>>> THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION 1986 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    ARTICLE II. DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES & STATE POLICIES

    SECTION 12
    .
    ……………. IT SHALL PROTECT THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER AND THE LIFE OF THE UNBORN FROM CONCEPTION.

    DICTIONARIES & SCIENCE DEFINTION OF CONCEPTION- IMMEDIATELY AFTER
              FERTILIZATION OR THE UNION OF THE EGG CELL & SPERM CELL.

    THEREFORE, ANY LAWS PROMOTING PILLS & IUD ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

    THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SHOULD STOP GIVING PILLS & IUD SINCE THEY
        ARE TECHNICALLY ABORTIFACIENT.

    READ MORE ON THE MODE OF ACTIONS OF PILLS & IUD.

    BE ENLIGHTENED

    PITIFUL

    • joshmale2004

      Section 12 of the Constitution is about protecting the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. This provision is about abortion. We already have a law that criminalize abortion. I believe, there is no provision in the RH Bill that legalizes abortion.

      • boldyak

        basta wag nyo gamitin ang tax na binabayad ko sa condoms para sa mga irresponsableng manyakis na hindi man lang makabili condom….kahit saan sa pinas makabili ka naman condom hindi pinagababawal ang pagbili…

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        Oo, hindi ibibigay yan sa pambili ng condom. Ipapamudmod lang yan sa mga squatter na walang trabaho.

      • boypalaban

         bakit di na lang bigyan ng trabaho imbes na condom?

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        That’s a separate issue. Besides, its really hard to find a good job if there’s oversupply of work force. Supply and demand lang yan dre. The more we need to control the population

      • boypalaban

         squatter na walang trabaho…ano ang mas kailangan: condom o trabaho?

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        both. By the way, bakit condom lang ang alam mong birth control?

      • boypalaban

        bakit nagpi-pills ka rin?

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        Ang bobo mo naman kung maisip mo na nagpipills ang lalaki. hahaha. 

      • boypalaban

        epekto ng kagagamit ng condom:kabobohan…kaya ayoko matulad ang iba sa akin…hahahaha

      • boypalaban

        gagawin kong mas personal para sa yo ang tanong: KUNG IKAW AY SQUATTTER NA WALANG TRABAHO, ANO ANG MAS GUGUSTUHIN MO..CONDOM O TRABAHO?

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        gagawin ko ring personal. Hindi ako magiging or naging squatter because I have known how to plan my family. therefore, hindi mangyyari yang case mo para sakin.

        By theway, di mo kailanbgan i-all CAPS yang comment mo, nababasa ko naman.

      • boypalaban

         safe answer…parang si pia angas epal dynasty cayetano…

        di mo masagot…alam mo kasing sasablay ka…at siguradong trabaho pipiliin mo…pero ipinangangalandakan mo yang condom mentality mo na yan…

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        Its loud and clear di mo lang maintindihan kaya palusot ang sagot mo. Tsaka hindi ba ikaw ang condom mentality kasi yan lang ang alam mo na birth control?

      • boypalaban

        reply sa taas…

      • boypalaban

        o sa mga proRH baka gusto niyo tulungan sa pagsagot si Pons Corpuz….
        napakasimple ng tanong…pero kung ano anong sinasabi at ginagawang palusot…

        eto lang ang tanong:

        Halimbawa, ikaw ay squatter na walang trabaho, ano ang mas pipiliin mo Condom o Trabaho? Isa lang ang dapat piliin…di pwede ang safe answer…

        (sabi kasi niya…mas ok daw ipamudmod ang condom sa mga squatter na walang trabaho….ang sabi ko mas ok bigyan ng trabaho kesa condom ang ibigay)

      • indiosbravos2002

        Hey Pons, the question is pretty illogical. The guy is just provoking you to trick you in answering. M.O. nya yan para mapansin.

      • http://twitter.com/alfs_alfs Pons Corpuz

        Thanks bro, but I know this kind of trick from very start. 

      • indiosbravos2002

        Amp. Apples to apples comparison yan ah. Mabuhay ka boss! Pinatawa mo kami. Hahahahaha.

      • boypalaban

        ako pa talaga ang palusot…
        uulitin ko ang tanong:
        Halimbawa, ikaw ay isang iskwater, halimbawa lang, at walang trabaho…ano ang mas pipiliin mo, condom o trabaho? isa lang ang pipiliin mo…
        Pwede kang patulong sa pagsagot sa mga kagaya mo ang pag-iisip…

      • txtman

        READ THE MODE OF ACTIONS OF PILLS & IUD

        PARA MATAUHAN KA INENG

        PITIFUL

      • joshmale2004

        There is a big difference between abortion and prevention. Abortion is to abort or kill something already evolving with life. Pills as you have mention is a preventive measure. As you requested, I read the mode of actions for pills. The pill prevents pregnancy by releasing hormones so the ovary will not produce eggs that can be fertilized by sperm. As you said conception starts when the sperm fertilizes the egg and life starts. If the sperm is not yet in contact with egg, there is yet no life or conception. So when you prevent this from happening, this is not an abortion but a prevention of something not yet having a life or fertilized. If you insist that this is an abortion, then it is tantamount of saying that since withdrawal method and mutual masturbation prevent your sperm and your partner’s egg to have a union, then even these two methods are considered an act of abortion. Right? Just a thought.

      • indiosbravos2002

        Dude, wag ka nang makipagargue kay TXTMAN parang nakikipagusap ka lang sa hangin dyan. Besides his arguments are illogical, unscientific at puro myths lang. Kung ikaw nakabase sa doctors/specilist sya nakabase argument sa faith healer.

      • joshmale2004

        Hahaha. Good Advice Bro. I will heed your advice.

      • im_not_convinced

        but i recall there was a provision inserted that a hospital is forced to treat a woman who has undergone an illegal abortion. makes abortion more accessible then if the risks are mitigated…  Please also don’t use tax payer’s money to purchase condoms which will be considered essential “drugs” once the RH is passed.

      • joshmale2004

        I’ve read that provision. Actually, it depends on how each individual would interpret that provision. for me, I personally interpret it not an encouragement to undergo for abortion as another way out but rather just laying out the ground rule of equal protection for all women and an access to medical help whether someone have undergone legal or illegal method why she needs a medical attention. Actually, this is already encompassed with our Medical Doctrine for Doctors that their profession requires them to treat all patients that require their attention. Even a criminal caught doing a crime and who is shot, he had done a punishable crime but if he requires medical attention, the estate is required to give them the proper medical attention. This is no different from a woman who willingly went for an illegal abortion but later on needs medical attention. Hospitals are required to give her medical attention but does not absolve her of what she has done illegally under our penal code.

      • indiosbravos2002

        Agree. The oath that all medical doctors took is to preserve a life regardless of the circumstances. A woman who has undergone abortion is not even relevant information for the doctor to save her life, besides saving her life is the christian thing to do, right?

      • joshmale2004

        Precisely.

      • boypalaban

        kapag Muslim ba ang nagligtas ng buhay ng katulad niyan ay gumagawa ng Christian act?

      • indiosbravos2002

        Huh, naguluhan ako sa tanong mo. How come pinasok mo Muslim sa usapan? Its not even relevsnt sa topic. Pero to patronize and answer you. Yes they are, in essence. The oath is universal. Hindi lang yan pang kristyano or moslem.

      • north pole

        the RH bill provides for distribution of contraceptive pills to poor folks. now, answer this – do these contraceptive pills contain abortifacients?

      • joshmale2004

        There is a big difference between abortion and prevention. Abortion is to abort or kill something already evolving with life. Pills as you have mention is a preventive measure. As you requested, I read the mode of actions for pills. The pill prevents pregnancy by releasing hormones so the ovary will not produce eggs that can be fertilized by sperm. As you said conception starts when the sperm fertilizes the egg and life starts. If the sperm is not yet in contact with egg, there is yet no life or conception. So when you prevent this from happening, this is not an abortion but a prevention of something not yet having a life or fertilized. If you insist that this is an abortion, then it is tantamount of saying that since withdrawal method and mutual masturbation prevent your sperm and your partner’s egg to have a union, then even these two methods are considered an act of abortion. Right? Just a thought.

      • north pole

        read again.  you didn’t check what abortifacient is.

      • joshmale2004

        My answer is NO. Abortifacient-describes a drug or device to induce abortion. MEDICAL PROOF (excerpt from National Catholic Research dated Feb 20, 21012. “The ethicists and medical professionals who contributed to the journal could not have known then how valuable their articles would become two years later, when the church and country would become embroiled in a controversy over contraception.
        Hamel’s words about the importance of adequate and accurate information in making moral judgments seems especially urgent now as many church leaders and commentators continue to use misleading information to argue that the HHS mandate will force employers to pay for abortion-inducing drugs.
        The HHS mandate allows women free access to all FDA-approved forms of contraception. This includes the IUDs (intrauterine devices), the drug Plan B (levonorgestrel) and a new drug called Ella (ulipristal acetate), which came on the market in 2010. Church officials and others have argued that because these three contraceptives are abortifacients, the government is forcing them to participate in the distribution of devices and drugs that cause abortion.
        The reality is that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that the IUD and Plan B work only as contraceptives. Since Ella is new to the market, it has not been studied as extensively. But as of now, there is no scientific proof that Ella acts as an abortifacient, either.
        There is only one drug approved to induce abortion. It is called RU-486 (mifepristone) and is not on the FDA’s list of approved contraception. It is available only by prescription and no employer is forced to pay for it as part of an employee health plan.
        To understand why scientists believe that the IUD, Plan B and Ella are not abortifacients, it is important first to understand the biology of conception. In order for a woman to become pregnant after sexual intercourse, her ovaries must release an egg (ovulation). Sperm can remain viable inside her reproductive tract for five days. Therefore, if intercourse takes place up to five days before ovulation or within two days after, both sperm and egg are viable and the egg cell can be fertilized.
        Now, just because an egg is fertilized doesn’t necessarily mean that it will develop into an embryo. For that to happen, the fertilized egg must be implanted into the endometrium that lines the uterus. Implantation happens seven days after fertilization, if it happens at all. Scientists estimate that, at a minimum, two-thirds of fertilized eggs fail to implant. Some scientists estimate that the number may even be as high as 80 percent, according to Discover Magazine.
        For this reason, according to the medical definition, a woman is not considered pregnant until the developing embryo successfully implants the lining of the uterus.” There is my answer to your question with medical reports as proof. I think I’ve proven my case to you. Now, can you show verifiable scientific proof and not religious or theory proof that Birth Controls contain abortifacients.

    • http://twitter.com/akongednamzug akongednamzug

      Kumusta ka na MR. GENIUS. Sabi mo noon 99.99999999% of mayors are corrupt and 99.99999999% of governors are corrupt. Kaya sang-ayon sa iyo halos 20% ng populasyon ng Pilipinas ay mga mayor at governor.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4C2SFYIH52Y2KR7QPZPHJO2XQQ sl1

    There is no one to blame except the pressure of the Catholic church and politicians who does not care about the our people but there own interest.

    • boypalaban

       politicians who will benefit 1000% if this bill is passed into law…
      para sa babe at mahihirap? ubos na mahihirap dito pagkagahaman ng mga sinumpang pulitiko na yan at mga opisyal ng gobyerno di pa mababawasan…

      RH BILL = CORRUPTION…wala nang iba…

  • burubudongstongstoings

    yong mga anti RH dito simula pa ng pag comment ko dito hanggang ngayon sila sila pa rin. wala bang nadagdag na mga anti RH sa inyo dito? o baka kokonti lang kau.

    • luzviminda88

      BWA HA HA HA. SIGE MGA KAMPON KO. IPAGLABAN ANG ATING KAHARIAN DITO SA IMPIYERNO AT MAY PREMYO KAYONG MALAMIG NA LUNGGA NA PAGTULUGAN BASTA KALABANIN ANG MGA ANTI RH BILL. DAPAT MAKONTROL NATIN ANG POPULASYON AT MAGWAGI ANG KORUPSIYON NG PUNDO NG PILIPINAS KAY BANAT PA AKING MAGIGITING NA ALIPORES. B WA HA HA HA HA

    • boypalaban

      kayo kayo pa rin naman…at ako na magpo-post ng mga sablay ninyong argumento:
      damaso
      pajero bishops,
      overpopulation
      pedophile
      anti AIDS
      Dark Ages
      Vatican

      wala na bang iba?

  • joboni96

    mabuhay ka cong kim

    transparency kills
    political shenanigans

    may afterglo(ria) pa rin si gonzales
    not like his father

  • martial_law_baby

    Buhay na naman si txtman, magaling na ang puerta na tinira ni Padre. Kaya ayaw nyan sa RH Bill kasi di naman sya mabubuntis kahit walang condom. Lunok na lang ng lunok o kaya sa puerta magpatira kay padre. Biktima yan ng pedophilia nung bata pa sa parokya nila. Di na nagreklamo dahil nabibigyan ni padre ng pera na kinukuha sa mga nakolektang abuloy sa simbahan nila. Kaya naka all caps yang computer nya. Dila ang gingamit sa pagtype dahil maga lagi ang kamay sa paghimas kay padre. Hahahaha. Pitiful.

  • joerizal

    Mag-release na lang kayo ng radioactive materials sa Manila para mabaog lahat ng tao diyan. Eh di solved ang problema, wala nang RH Bill na kailangan. Damay na pati yung mga pari na manyakis.

    • boypalaban

      wag naman…kawawa naman yung madadamay…pero pwede rin ipasak sa wepaks mo yung radioactive materials…

      • joerizal

        sino ang madadamay, ikaw? Dapat ikaw ang unahin na i-castrate.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NMM3BZ5SAKNWSIDYG3BSIOFNKY Stephen

    Mga Pinoys, this is the kind of politican (Neptali Gonzales II) you are voting for…. You know what? Only idiots and fools will vote for him. Let’s wait and see how many of those people will tally on the next election. Go for it Cong. Kim we support you.

    • indiosbravos2002

      He is the choice of the people of Mandaluyong being their representative They also vote for Abalos. So you might have a point with regard to your “idiots and fools” comment.

      • boypalaban

        mukhang may ipinahihiwatig ka sa sinabi mo ah?
        ganon ba kapag taga Mandaluyong?
        porke ba na-delay ang botohan sa RH Bill, may topak na mga bumoto diyan?
        kumusta naman ang topak mong pangulo? tulo laway…yan siguradong may topak…PSP, X-Box, Shooting with Kabarilan…topaks…topacio…yagbols…abnoy….
        by the way, di ako taga Mandaluyong….

      • indiosbravos2002

        Ok. Easy lang. BP mo. Lake ng galit kay Aquino ah. Personal anger ba yan?

      • boypalaban

        hindi naman…
        kung si gloriarrovo ay gahaman…yang pangulo mo utak condom at pulbura…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WIWYLFLU4LPKS7B2ZLLRVFKS3Y vir_a

    Irresponsible Cong. Gonzalez. He has no concern for the people and the country.

  • joshmale2004

    Mr Txtman. There is a big difference between abortion and prevention. Abortion is to abort or kill something already evolving with life. Pills as you have mention is a preventive measure. As you requested, I read the mode of actions for pills. The pill prevents pregnancy by releasing hormones so the ovary will not produce eggs that can be fertilized by sperm. As you said conception starts when the sperm fertilizes the egg and life starts. If the sperm is not yet in contact with egg, there is yet no life or conception. So when you prevent this from happening, this is not an abortion but a prevention of something not yet having a life or fertilized. If you insist that this is an abortion, then it is tantamount of saying that since withdrawal method and mutual masturbation prevent your sperm and your partner’s egg to have a union, then even these two methods are considered an act of abortion. Right? Just a thought.

  • joshmale2004

    Off course. Business matters will always be present with this Bill as well as every law that starts to exist. But this is for a different side of the paradigm. On the other hand as individuals especially most of the oposers of this bill which are predominantly males, we should also understand the need for equal protection and health demands for our women especially for our wife if we truly love them. What would a husband do if her wife has a medical condition that she can not afford another pregnancy but requested you that she wants to maintain your loving sexual activities to continue so she asked you that you use contraceptives for both your pleasure without risking pregnancy? Will you not acceed to her request just since we have a negative position on the RH Bill? I think this is hypocrisy.

  • carlorocci

    Nakakahalata na ko, ahhh…Every 3 hrs. may article tungkol sa RH bill na ipinaglalaban kuno ni kongresswoman Cojuangco…..Hahahahahaha…Mga politiko nga naman…..Sasakyan lahat pati condum…..Hay…ewan…..

    • boypalaban

      sasakyan?….parang yung lobo lang na paikot ikot sa tubig sa SM-MOA ah…kanino kayang condom yon?

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

      SA SINGAPORE ISA SA PINAKAMAYAMAN BANSA AY MAY R.H BILL NA BATAS BAKIT AYAW NG MGA BISHOPS TALIBAN NG FAMILY PLANING GUS2 NILA MULTIPLYING PARA DAW DUMAMI STREET CHILDREN AT ISNATCHER” GO BACK TO VATICAN STOP TERRORISIM IN THE PHILIPPINES KATOLIBAN”’

  • indiosbravos2002

    My take on this is that most congressmen do not want to even tackle the controversial bill on an election year. More of trying to appease everyone by avoiding the issue. This is a dangerous game of putting politics first over national interest. Who said the bishops do not have a say when clearly political will is taking a backseat.

    If nothing happens, the ProRH can always take the issue to the elections in 2013. There are a substantial number of months leading to the elections to actually identify politicians who delayed and blocked its passage. First on the list is Enrile and Gonzales.

    • joshmale2004

      That’s a big possibility. By showing now to public their stand could mean thousands of votes less from either the opposing sides of the public.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/E4QT2QOIDHINWJ2CE2WIHNYNIA Shine

      Dahil for sure, ililista ng mga Anti-RH at religious groups kung sinu-sino ang “hindi dapat iboto.”

      ~~mayayari lang sila.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EDXEVEFHW2ZT5VWHDWBNM6XGE4 RyanE

    PDI or some other groups should start tabulating the senators and representatives who are pro-RH or anti-RH so that the public may be guided accordingly come election time.

    I for one and my family, including relatives and friends that I can convince will absolutely junk all anti-RH politicians. 

    PASS THE RH BILL NOW!!

    • boypalaban

      may naghahakot ng basura…pwede mo na ipahakot yang mga pulitiko…itira mo lang yung mga contraceptives…pwede pang pakinabangan yan ng mga mahihirap at mamamatay na sa gutom…pwede yan ipalit ng pera para pamasahe at pangtuition…pwede ring ipapalit pambili ng gamot…daming gamit…ok talaga mga tongressman…I SALUTE YOU HONORABLE TONGRESSMEN AND SENATONGS!

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

      CBCP BISHOPS TALIBAN SAY STREET CHILDREN ISNATCHER IS MORE FUN IN THE PHILIPPINES”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6S5WY2V6JJ3CCL42UZAZCBH3JQ Third

    Never ask a Trapo to do a Legislator’s job..Is anyone really surprised by the inaction of Boyet Gonzales?
     

    • virgoyap

       Politics!!!!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/NV25ZPWMBDYFXEYR3AWQ43ZS5E Hein S

    UGLY Trapo boyet gonzales

    • boypalaban

      Steven Zahl…
      medyo bago ang post mo ah…

      isulat mo ulit yung Let us not be trying hard Catholics….

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

      CBCP BISHOPS TALIBAN IS IDIOT PILIPINO PEOPLE NEED FAMILY FAMILY PLANING PASS R.H BILL NOWWW STOP TERRORISIM MGA KAMPON NG DILIM”

  • regd

    I’m in love that’s all I can say!

  • tukmoldinako

    dina kailangan yang RH bill, isama nalang sa school yung value of life and parenting. kasi naman ang daming kabataan ngayon, 16 palang buntis na, kasi natigil sa pagaaral dahil sa K12 di kinaya ng mga magulang ang pagaaral  ayun tumambay sa kalye , karamihan mga prosti

    Tamang gabay ng magulang ang kailangan di RH risky habit ang labas ng mga menor de edad. 

  • Diepor

    Pro Life, Pass The Bill RH Bill

    • boypalaban

      punta ka na sa mga schools, malls, palengke,…simulan mo na mamigay ng condom at pills…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QZZKXPEA67I7HELEIYM35QVYFA Jon

    “We are all being brought for a ‘ride’ by such trapo style politics. So there, the truth is out,” she said.

    A rude awakening to the unscrupulous nature of the administration-controlled House of Representatives.
    Moral of the story: Never believe these people as they say one thing but mean to do the opposite.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

    CBCP BISHOPS TALIBAN SAY REPRODUCTION IS MORE FUN IN THE PHILIPPINES”’

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

    SA SINGAPORE ISA SA PINAKAMAYAMAN BANSA SA BUONG MUNDO AY MAY R.H BILL BAKIT AYAW NG CBCP BISHOPS TALIBAN SA FAMILY PLANING GUS2 NILA MULTIPLYING PARA DUMAMI ANG STREET CHILDREN AT ISNATCHER AT KUMAKAIN NG BASURA CBCP BISHOPS STOP TERRORISIM TO THE PILIPINO NATION KAMPON NG DILIM GO BACK TO VATICAN MEDICAL SCIENCE SAY R.H BILL IS A SULUTION 

    • boypalaban

      SA SINGAPORE KA TUMIRA…AT DOON KA NA RIN TUMIRA NG MGA TINITIRA MONG STREETCHILDREN…BASTA MAG CONDOM KA LANG…PARA WALANG SABIT…AT ISUBO MO NA RIN KARGADA NI DAMASO CELDRAN…DIYAN KAYO SA MADIDILIM NA SULOK NG INTRAMUROS…ENJOY…TAKE YOUR TIME…WAG MAGMADALI…

  • NYPinoy

    A brave congresswoman vs. a lying useless Majority Floor Leader…

  • Your_King

    The FOI bill, the Sin Tax bill, and the RH bill are all different issues. But they all have one thing in common…they are all delayed. Is Aquino doing anything about this?



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace
Advertisement