Controversial mining rules suspended | Inquirer News

Controversial mining rules suspended

/ 01:33 AM September 29, 2012

The controversial implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the government’s new mining policy have been suspended amid industry clamor for clarification on certain provisions, including one on the review of mining contracts, Environment Undersecretary Demetrio Ignacio Jr. said.

The IRR for Executive Order No. 79, which embodies President Benigno Aquino III’s policy on mining, was supposed to take effect Saturday (Sept. 29), 15 days after it was published.

Ignacio on Friday issued a memorandum to all concerned offices and the Mining and Geosciences Bureau, stating that Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) administrative order 2012-07 or the IRR of EO 79 has been suspended, “pending the issuance and effectivity of amendments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The decision to suspend the IRR, Ignacio added, was reached after a Malacañang meeting on Monday convened by the Mining Industry Coordinating Council (MICC), headed by Finance Secretary Cesar Purisima.

FEATURED STORIES

‘Less ambiguous’

“It was decided to make the IRR less ambiguous,” the undersecretary said, adding that the meeting had been called over concerns raised by the Chamber of Mines of the Philippines (COMP) on Section 9 of the guidelines, which it has described as “patently illegal.”

The COMP said the government review of mining contracts would shorten the maximum 50-year period for projects by imposing a bidding scheme for its renewal after the first 25 years of a tenement.

The group further said that the provision contradicted the Philippine Mining Act of 1995, which provides that “mineral agreements shall have a term not exceeding 25 years to start from the date of execution, and renewable for another term not exceeding 25 years under the same terms and conditions, without prejudice to charges mutually agreed upon by the parties.”

The COMP declined to comment on the suspension.

On Thursday, the group released a statement seeking clarification from the government on the implementing rules of the mining reforms to “appease investor apprehensions.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The COMP said it was addressing a letter to the MICC to voice concerns on the language reported in the media concerning the revised IRR.   The group said, however, that it had “received instructions not to distribute the letter outside the MICC.”

Last-minute insertion

In its statement, COMP said it acknowledged President Aquino’s and the MICC’s response to their concerns regarding “the unauthorized last-minute insertion made by Environment Secretary Ramon Paje” in the IRR of EO 79 on mining policy reforms.

“We are conscious of our government’s difficult duty of balancing interests. As an industry clearly viewed by the Aquino administration as a key source of quality long-term investments, we recognize the efforts of the MICC to establish a consistent and stable business climate that fosters development as well as the integrity of the environment and the community,” COMP said.

The COMP has earlier said that mining firms might opt to sue the government for a “patently illegal” provision on contract reviews under Section 9 of the IRR of EO 79.

COMP president Benjamin Philip Romualdez told reporters on the sidelines of the Mining Philippines 2012 Conference that mining companies were “preparing legal action against the government” as the provision allows the government to renegotiate the terms of mining contracts after the first 25 years. This, Romualdez said, effectively shortens the potential project period from the existing maximum of 50 years.

He also cited challenges in the mining industry that are hampering investments at a time when the government is seeking more revenues from the industry.  These include the long-standing moratorium on new contracts pending changes in mining tax laws, local government ordinances that ban mining in certain areas and methods such as open-pit mining, as well as the high investment requirement amid high political risks.

Outflow of investments

“The moratorium has caused an outflow in foreign direct investments in our sector beginning in 2011 to the tune of over P10 billion,” Romualdez said.

“The projected $16 billion of investments that were supposed to [come] during this administration will not happen,” he added.

Ignacio told the Inquirer that during the meeting in Malacañang, the members of the MICC agreed to amend the controversial provision on a government review of existing mining contracts to make it clearer, and to suspend the implementation of the IRR until the amendment is published.

“We are not going to do anything else,” the undersecretary said, referring to changes in other portions of the IRR.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

EO 79 has been touted as the centerpiece of the government’s mining reforms program, while the IRR was described as leaning more toward environmental preservation than raising government revenues from mining.

TAGS: Mining, mining policy

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.