Aquino orders gov’t historians to compile stories of martial law survivors for youthBy TJ Burgonio
Philippine Daily Inquirer
MANILA, Philippines – President Benigno Aquino III, decrying attempts to recast martial law in a good light, on Friday ordered the government’s historians to compile stories of the survivors for the sake of youngsters who have no memory of the dark period.
As the country marked the 40th anniversary of the proclamation of martial law on Sept. 21, 1972, the President expressed disbelief at lingering perception by some Filipinos that the 13-year-long martial rule by strongman Ferdinand Marcos did the country good.
Speaking before a crowd of mostly high school students at the Bantayog ng mga Bayani in Quezon City, Aquino highlighted the key points of the martial rule, refreshing the people’s memory, in the face of attempt by propagandists and revisionists to cast it in a positive light.
“To ensure that the information we’re passing onto the youth is based on a truthful event in our history, I have directed the National Historical Commission of the Philippines to form a committee,” he told the crowd, which also included families of martial law victims and officials.
The committee’s job, the President said, was to compile experiences and stories of the individuals who lived during martial law.
“We want to ensure that the source of information in students’ books will be the truth, not falsehoods pieced together by the propagandists, and not bits of deception by the revisionists,” he said.
The President laid a wreath and then gave a salute before the Bantayog’s Wall of Remembrance to honor the countless individuals who died and disappeared fighting the dictatorship.
“There’s a saying `those who forget the errors of the past are bound to commit them’. Let’s not allow our rights and freedom to be at risk again,” Aquino said. “I will not allow the errors of history to be passed onto the next generation. Let’s treasure the lessons of martial law.”
“I don’t want you to experience the difficulties and sacrifices my father went through,” he said, referring to then opposition leader Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino Jr., who was assassinated on Aug. 21, 1983 on his return from exile in the United States, “and other victims of Martial Law.”
In his speech, the President wondered aloud why some Filipinos held the view that life was “much better” during Marcos’ martial rule, and if it had been extended, the country would be more progressive.
He said he respected such views, but said: “Can they answer us and look at us straight in the eye if we ask them: Did something good really come out of martial law?”
If martial law was the right solution to crimes, how come Marcos’ rule was marked by the disappearances, salvaging and summary of executions of individuals, Mr. Aquino wondered.
The martial rule was also defined by the increase in the number of the communist rebels from 1,250 in 1972 to 40,000 in 1983, and the devaluation of the peso against the dollar, he said.
“Is this the new society that they promised? Judge it for yourself,” he said.
Aquino lamented that 40 years later, the public “remained blind” about the details of martial law, including the fact that while Marcos signed Proclamation Number 1081 on Sept. 21, 1972, he only announced its imposition two days later.
In those two days, Marcos had his bitter critics arrested, he said.
“This is the reason why my father was arrested on Sept. 22, as well as other personalities and civilians who were viewed as threats to the regime Marcos was forming. Unknown to the public, on that same day, Marcos issued his most atrocious order as a dictator: General Order No. 1, which placed all powers and operations of the government directly under one man–Mr. Marcos,” Mr. Aquino said.
Marcos justified his order by citing rising criminality and a worsening rebellion, he said.
“I was only 12 years old then, and had no idea what impact September 1972 would have on our family. Yes, I noticed that my father was listless before the declaration of martial law, but as a young boy, I didn’t give it much thought,” he said.
Soon after, checkpoints would be set up, and newspapers and radio stations would be shut down. Marcos would craft his own Constitution, and when he felt this would not prosper in in a plebiscite, he had this approved by mere “raising of hands” in every barangay (village), Aquino said.
Through this Constitution, Marcos removed the powers of Congress and Supreme Court, vesting himself with all the powers of the State, he said.
On April 6, 1978, the eve of the elections of the Interim Batasang Pambansa, many Filipinos joined a massive noise barrage to support the elder Aquino’s party. While they lost, the protest kicked off a series of demonstrations in schools, public squares and government offices, he said.
Responding to international criticism, Marcos lifted martial law in 1981, but he still held the powers of the State. The situation came to a head in the elder Aquino’s assassination in 1983 that sparked the February 1986 Revolution that ousted Marcos.
“I just want to clarify. We recovered democracy not because of the assassination of my father, but by the hundreds of heroes who risked their lives to fight for the rights of the oppressed,” he said.