Quantcast
Latest Stories

Technical dissolution

By

THE admission of the new partner in the partnership will cause the latter’s dissolution. The dissolution of a partnership is the change in the relation of the parties caused by any partner ceasing to be associated in the carrying on of the business (Art. 1828, Civil Code).

Upon its dissolution, the partnership continues and its legal personality is retained until the complete winding up of its business culminating in its termination (Art. 1829, Civil Code).

Please note however that the term “dissolution” as used in our Civil Code simply means the point in time when all the partners cease to carry on the business together, and should not be understood as necessarily including the winding up and the termination of the partnership. Thus, it has been held in SEC Opinions dated August 18, 1983 and June 29, 1960 that the admission of new partners through a sale of the interest of an existing partner dissolves the partnership.

But the dissolution in such case is only in the sense that his connection with the partnership is terminated, that is, there is only a technical dissolution. The SEC Opinions cited the following American authorities:

“Any change in the membership or personnel of a partnership, either by the retirement of a partner or by the admission of new members into the partnership, produces, technically, an immediate dissolution of the existing partnership relation and the formation of a new one, although common business usage speaks of the admission of a partner to a firm and regards the firm as subsisting so long as the course of its business is not materially interrupted . . .” (40 Am. Jur. par. 197, p. 267).

Based on the foregoing, the admission of the new partner into the partnership brings about the technical dissolution of the partnership. However, the operations of the partnership can still continue provided that there is no material interruption due to the dissolution and the intention of the partners is to continue the business (SEC Opinion dated April 25, 1985).

If the new partner has not yet put in additional capital, however, the partnership may still continue its operations but such partner however will become a debtor of the partnership for whatever he may have promised to contribute thereto (Article 1786 of the Civil Code).

Moreover, a partner who has undertaken to contribute a sum of money and fails to do so becomes a debtor for the interest and damages from the time he should have complied with his obligation (Article 1788 of the Civil Code).

* **

You may contact the author at rester.nonato@yahoo.com.


Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Business , Tax



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Murder case filed vs suspect in killing of Batangas assistant prosecutor
  • Classes in some Metro Manila schools canceled over flood fears
  • Cagayan de Oro electric utility office, customers robbed
  • Probe into MV Lady of Mt. Carmel sinking to kick off this week
  • Pangasinan high school teacher, 2 others arrested for allegedly selling shabu
  • Sports

  • Arellano a ‘team to beat’ in NCAA 89
  • NBA: Spurs to go for broke in game six
  • Heat back on familiar, and shaky, ground in the finals
  • Dapudong kayoes SA fighter, bags IBO title
  • Who is to prevent a Game 7?
  • Lifestyle

  • US study links pollution to autism risk
  • Miss USA contestant latest beauty queen to botch answer
  • What Aga Muhlach, Anne Curtis, Iza Calzado are trying out these days
  • PCSO opens more offices in the provinces for medical assistance
  • Aiming for mindfulness in our daily activities
  • Entertainment

  • Tax appeal court affirms guilty tax evasion verdict vs beauty doctor Mendez
  • ‘World War Z’ draws massive crowd in NYC
  • Superman reboot ‘Man of Steel’ soars over US box office
  • In a limo with Dayanara Torres who plugs “200 Cartas”
  • Celebs recall their fun school days
  • Business

  • US stocks jump ahead of Fed meeting
  • OFW remittances up by 6% to $2B in April
  • Asian markets mixed ahead of US Fed meeting
  • Peso falls anew on weak trading
  • US stocks leap on market open
  • Technology

  • Facebook CEO meets SKorean president
  • Chinese supercomputer named as world’s fastest
  • Echoes can reveal the shape of a room
  • Mysterious Facebook event sparks online buzz
  • Russian tycoon wants to move mind to machine
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, June 18, 2013
  • Turbulent times
  • Hijacking the press
  • Making the grade
  • Rizal’s equal
  • Global Nation

  • Legislator bares sexual exploitation of Filipinas by PH embassy personnel
  • US convenience stores exploited immigrants from PH, Pakistan
  • California Senate honors June 12 and Filipino contributions
  • 44 aliens in credit card scam ordered arrested
  • Global warming threatens coastal cities
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    news
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved