Quantcast
Latest Stories
CORONA IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

73% prefer Corona conviction, says latest SWS survey

Seventy-three percent of Filipinos polled by the Social Weather Station believe that Chief Justice Renato Corona is guilty of the impeachment charges against him while 25 percent believe he is not.

More than six of every 10 adult Filipinos would accept any outcome in the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona, but if it came down to their personal preference, 73 percent wanted a conviction, results of a Social Weather Stations survey released on Thursday showed.

Only one in every four respondents preferred an acquittal.

The survey, which covered 1,200 respondents nationwide, was conducted on March 10-13, at a time when the defense panel started its presentation. The impeachment trial adjourned on March 23 for a Lenten break and will resume on May 7.

The noncommissioned survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points for national percentages and plus or minus 6 percentage points for regional percentages.

The SWS said that among those favoring conviction, there was an “intense” sentiment to see Corona testify personally before the Senate impeachment court.

Asked whether it was important for Corona to testify personally in the trial, 73 percent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, while 26 percent said otherwise.

The House prosecution panel was elated over the results of the SWS survey.

“SWS confirms what we’ve always been saying that the Chief Justice is expected by the people to show up, even including those who think he’s innocent,” said Marikina Representative Romero Quimbo, a spokesperson for the prosecution.

“Those who think he’s not guilty, which is merely 25 percent of those surveyed, believe he must show up at the trial,” the lawmaker said.

Quimbo said that the nonappearance of the Chief Justice at his own impeachment trial would be disadvantageous to the defense panel since it would not be able to answer issues raised by both the prosecution and senator-judges in the course of the two-month trial.

“His failure to show up will render a death blow to his defense,” said Quimbo.

Defense reaction

Lawyers defending Corona also welcomed the results of the survey, but said the decision of the Senate should be based only on law and evidence.

At a news briefing, defense lawyer Rico Paolo Quicho said the results were “an indicator of where we are now and what we still need to do toward our direction of acquittal … and to make sure that we will be methodical and clear in our explanation.”

But Quicho said the survey results “should not be used in  propaganda (against Corona) and sway public opinion because what the people have heard so far is only the side of the prosecution.”

Not popularity contest

Tranquil Salvador III, also a member of the defense panel, reiterated that the impeachment trial in the Senate was “not a popularity contest,” saying the public should focus more on the evidence presented by both the defense and prosecution panels in court than the issues being discussed in the media.

Salvador noted that the SWS survey was done a day after the defense started presenting its evidence and witnesses in support of Corona’s claim of innocence.

He expressed optimism that results of future surveys would eventually favor the Chief Justice and the defense panel as it continued to offer documentary and testimonial evidence to debunk the impeachment articles against Corona.

Premature

Jose Midas Marquez, Supreme Court spokesperson and administrator, said it was premature for anybody to conduct opinion polls because the impeachment trial was ongoing.

“We don’t know the basis of the respondents in saying that (the Chief Justice) is guilty or innocent. The defense isn’t through yet,” Marquez said in a text message.

The results of the survey showed that 79 percent in Metro Manila and 70 percent among Class ABC would accept any outcome of the trial.

Indicator of public anxiety

The percentage of those who preferred a guilty verdict was a high  81 percent in Metro Manila and 65 percent in the Visayas. By socioeconomic group, 84 percent in Class ABC and 70 percent in Class E wanted a guilty verdict.

The respondents were also asked whether they trusted the Senate to issue a fair verdict. Fifty-one percent said they were unsure, 30 percent said they had much trust, and 19 percent said they had little trust in the impeachment court.

“The dominance of the middle position, with a near-balance of the positive and negative sides, indicates public anxiety about the ultimate decision of the Senate,” SWS said in a statement.

The survey also delved into the perception on the move of the House of Representatives to impeach Corona.

Fifty-three percent of the respondents were satisfied while 17 percent were dissatisfied, resulting in a net satisfaction rate of 36 percent.

Satisfaction was high (30-49 percent) in all demographic groups, but most of all in Metro Manila (42 percent) and Class ABC (45 percent), SWS said.

More than half of Filipinos, or 51 percent, were satisfied with the ongoing impeachment trial, while 20 percent were dissatisfied, resulting in a net satisfaction rating of 31 percent.

Satisfaction was moderate (between 10-29 percent) in Luzon outside Manila, the Visayas and among non-high-school graduates, SWS said.

Enrile’s performance

The SWS also brought up the perception on the performance of Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile as presiding officer in the impeachment trial, the pace of the trial and the performance of both the prosecution and defense.

Enrile obtained a “very good” 55-percent net satisfaction rating, with 66 percent saying they were satisfied with his performance and 11 percent saying they were dissatisfied.

As for the pace of the trial, a plurality of 49 percent said it was “too slow,” followed by 40 percent who said it was just “right” and 11 percent who felt it was “hurried.”

Just manner

Fifty-four percent were satisfied and 15 percent were dissatisfied that the prosecution of Corona was being conducted “in a just manner,” resulting in a net rating of 39 percent.

On the other hand, 49 percent were satisfied, and 18 percent were dissatisfied with the manner the defense was being conducted “in a just manner,” resulting in a net rating of 31 percent.

Asked about the fairness of the trial, 69 percent said the trial was giving the right consideration to both sides. However, 17 percent said the trial was favoring the defense, while 12 percent said it was partial to the prosecution.

Asked whether the Chief Justice should “resign as soon as possible,” “wait to be acquitted and then resign,” or “leave office only if found guilty,”  49 percent said he should wait to be acquitted before resigning.

Thirty percent said he should resign soon while 18 percent said he should leave only if found guilty.

The SWS survey results also showed that 73 percent of Filipinos want Corona to personally testify in the impeachment trial while 26 percent believe he does not need to.

Conclusions

The survey also enumerated some conclusions based on the views of those who preferred either conviction or acquittal:

  • Those preferring a guilty verdict were relatively more satisfied with the action of the House of Representatives to impeach Corona, the ongoing trial and Enrile’s performance.
  • Both the proconviction and proacquittal sides were mainly unsure whether the Senate would make a fair decision, but the proconviction side has a more pronounced tilt toward trust.
  • The proconviction side was mainly impatient with the trial’s pace, while the proacquittal side was mostly patient.
  • Both sides said the trial was being conducted fairly but also worried that their opponents were being favored.
  • Both sides felt the prosecution and defense were conducting their work fairly.
  • Both sides strongly favored Corona quitting after obtaining an acquittal, if not earlier. However, more from the proacquittal side favored waiting for a verdict. Only a few from either side said Corona should remain in office in case of an acquittal.

The majorities from either side said they would accept the trial’s outcome, with the percentage of the proconviction side “somewhat larger.” Reports from Matikas Santos, INQUIRER.net; Inquirer Research; Marlon Ramos, Michael Lim Ubac and Cynthia Balana, PDI

Originally posted at 07:25 pm | Thursday, March 29,  2012


Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Corona Impeachment , Judiciary , opinion survey , Politics , Renato Corona , survey , SWS , SWS survey

  • http://twitter.com/alexdizon04 alex

    thats d reality mr cj

  • tabalu

    attn. : pulse asia & sws,

    subukan nyo nga pong i-survey ang ganito; NANINIWALA BA KAYO SA MGA LUMALABAS NA SURVEY TUNGKOL SA KUNG MA-I-IMPEACH O HINDI SI CJ CORONA?

    at para transparent dito na ninyo sa yahoo.philppines forum gawin ang survey’

    • hukom2

      Meron ginawang survey ang PDI dito… di mo alam? 80% ang gustong maconvict ang amo mong si CORONA! Ayaw mo pa ring maniwala? Sige sumama ka na dun sa SC ground at mki-rally ka sa mga tuta ni CORONA! Magparami kayo ha! At pagdumami kayo, puntahan nyo si GMA sa veterance hospital at pati na si Abalos sa Pasay, Magsama-sama kayo! Kung gusto nyo mauna na kayong mag EDSA 4!!! Kailangan maraming-marami kayo, talunin nyo yung EDSA 1 ha! Yan… OK ka na? 

      Alam mo, sira ulo lang ang sasagot sa tanong mo! Intindihin mo nga mabuti tanong mo? 

      • tabalu

        e ikaw pala ang walang alam eh, para karing si amo mong abnoy at ang nanay niyang wala ring alam, hindi dumami ang tao dunsa edsa 1 kung hindi kay enrile at ramos, nasaan si tita mong walang alam nasa cebu, umuwi nalang nung malinis na sa edsa, sa PDI kamo, di mo rin ba alam na mga bataan ng cojuangco aquino yan, ayaw ko nang magpaliwanag sa mga taong kagaya mo na sarado ang isip at utak dilaw

      • hukom2

        Hidi ako maka CORRY o NOYNOY… makabayan ako IHO! Nasan ka ba nung EDSA1, nan dun ka ba? Wag kang gumawa ng mga sarili mong haka-haka. Alam mo ba yung ibig sabihin ng “little knowledge is very dangerous”? Kung hindi mo kayang stablish ang punto mo, wag kang makipagtalo! Hindi sarado ang utak ko, at lalong hindi paranoid na kagaya mo!

        Kung estudiante ka pa, mag-aral ka muna iho… halata sa sulat mo na hungkag at walang laman ang iyong katuwiran!

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/IQZXJQPCZXHXY3HMQB7QAXTYKA Rey Ban

         haha tepong na corner…yellow talaga…

      • fojar

        Don’t make patol to tabalu. Haven’t u noticed the way his/her comment is crafted? no sense and logic. Obviously it came from a paid blogger hehe.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/IQZXJQPCZXHXY3HMQB7QAXTYKA Rey Ban

       saka sir tabalu..sabi atty roy papa survey daw sa false asia saka sws yung 6,000 farmers sa hacienda luisita kung guilty o acquitted si cj..malamang 6k acquitted – 0 guilty daw ang score…haha eto yung truth…tunay na truth…

    • erisq2003

      Mas niniwala ako sa SWS at Pulse asia.  Matagal na sila sa ganyang survey.  Maraming ng napatunayan yan.  Like Erap, PNOY, Binay, Noli. Kasam narin si Merriam, enrile, chiz, trillanes, Joker, Jingoy, Bong, Lito lapid.  Lahat yan ay nanalo sa eleksyon na nasa SWS survey at pulse asia.  

  • My mom

    Poll surveys that jump the gun get results that they deserve – ignorant opinions.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/IQZXJQPCZXHXY3HMQB7QAXTYKA Rey Ban

    paki survey nman po kami dito..bakit kayo kayo lang..

    • fojar

      Watch out, malapit na mag survey dyan sa SC at INC wag kayo mainip.

      • EmilBaligod

        tama ka. gaganti na lang kayo kapag nagsurvey sa SC at INC. hehehhe. kung pupunta diyan an surveyor….

  • MG

    Tama na iyan mga survey. Alam natin kung sino sino ang mayari ng mga iyan, Kamaganak Inc.. Hayaan na ang Senado maghusga. Maytiwala ako sa kanila. 

    • erisq2003

      Ako RIN may tiwala ako sa mga Senator Judges. GAgamitin nila ang:

      1)  Pakiramdam, 2) Pag Tingin sa Interest ng Bayan,  3) Ang Batas, 4)  Ang halatang gumamit ng impluwensya para makuha ang isang bagay ng di alam ng kamag anak. 6)  Ang pagtatago ng Dollar account na ginagamit pa ang batas.  4)  Ang paurong sulong sa pag testify. 7)  Ang pagiging malapit sa mga kawatan nung nakaraanng Adminsitrasyon.  8)  Ang pagiging Supreme court na di man lang nag practice ng law at di man lang dumaan sa Judge sa Regional, Court of Appeals. 6)  ang sumira sa Seniority ng CJ Supreme court GAMIT ANG PAGIGING MALAPIT SA MALAPIT NG MAKULONG NA SI GMA. HAHAHAHAHAAH  

  • EmilBaligod

    magagalit nanaman si Miriam niyan> …takpan na lang ang tenga ninyo kung magsalita siya.

    • erisq2003

      Wag, baka sugudin ka nyan.  At pag namalas baka may mabaril pa. hahahahaha

  • KarmaGMA

    mas mabuti pa ipa daan na lang sa national referendum.  sa palagay ko aabot 90% ang mag sabi na dapat lang i convict si thief justice.

  • concern_people

     this surveys creates only confusion to people. why not let the senate decide for the case..?the survey will create a halo effect in their decision. this administration is truly desperate to convict CJ CORONA for whatever means. They used every resources just to influence public and the senate for whatever the results in the impeachment. Let say CJ Corona is convicted in the Senate..What’s next?Do we need to go for ONE MAN RULE..most may not agree with my observation but as i observed from day to day news..from the executive down to the cabinet secretaries the message is very clear..if there is a roadblock with P-noys “daang matuwid”..they pointed out specifically the appointee of former Pres.Arroyo the “daang matuwid” of P-noy won’t work. Why they can say that?Why not let them work for their own?They just put in the mind of people that the appointee of the former Pres is the roadblock to success for daang matuwid.. Why not provide people a progressive program especially for the poor to lessen the unemployment rate?. These should be prioritize by the gov’t..this is the real issue not the appointee of the past administration. Don’t blame the past administration.. P-noy is there in the Presidency..he knows the problem, he knows the real issue but he’s not working it out to elevate the country to the higher level. In the 2nd year of his term..i never saw any changes or any specific program in our country except for the impeachment. Does this administration only want to prove that in this administration they prosecute corrupt official for the past administration?How about the millions of people waiting for his attention especially the poor?how about the economic of our country.. There’s another four more years to go to prove or else..we live in an administration that have no specific direction but to prosecute whoever they want……

    • maria__maria

      because it’s news, so it’ll say what’s up.  a supreme court justice, CHIEF, should be whiter than white.  the law says people have to be accounted for the wrong they do.  are you saying everybody else should except Corona?  you?  if you did something wrong you’ll go to jail.  Corona should not be a judge!  He is a joke!



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • It’s Furlough Friday for federal workers
  • Church revenge: Buhay says Catholic vote was key
  • It’s looking like NP’s for Drilon, says Alan Cayetano
  • Substandard maritime schools warned anew
  • 78 massacre suspects face charges over 58th victim
  • Sports

  • Vengeful Beermen destroy Slammers
  • Ateneo goes for sweep
  • Que fires career-low 62, rules Orchard by four
  • Warriors foil Archers; Lions, Chiefs triumph
  • Paragua still leads
  • Lifestyle

  • Desperately seeking Sarah Jessica
  • Don’t let your husband be the be-all and end-all of your existence
  • Katrina Razon–out of the shadow of her billionaire father, and into her own music spotlight
  • Surviving widowhood
  • Five don’ts to help ease separation anxiety
  • Entertainment

  • Julie Delpy on life at 40
  • It takes two to do the show biz breakup cha-cha
  • Juday: Violence against women unacceptable
  • PH cineastes celebrate in the French Riviera
  • Stone Temple Pilots sue ex-frontman Scott Weiland
  • Business

  • Coco sugar sweetens small town’s finances
  • Along Mt. Bulusan’s foothills: A balmy ‘agricultural resort’
  • For Mona Serrano, there is no ‘escape’ from entrepreneurship
  • Buildings designed with unique character finding market
  • 18 Avon top sellers get a car each in ‘lipstick red’ shade
  • Technology

  • A new way for Filipinos to connect on social media launched
  • Statement of Smart Communications
  • Yahoo takes big leap with $1.1B deal for Tumblr
  • Poll: More US teens turn to Twitter; Facebook old
  • Tips to avoid becoming an identity theft victim
  • Opinion

  • Deep impact
  • The return of traditional politics in Pampanga
  • Most important investment incentive
  • Making (and keeping) friends
  • The Trinity and us
  • Global Nation

  • Sky lanterns light up Iloilo sky, set world record
  • Filipino WWII veterans used to cover up for senators’ inaction on family unification
  • Warship from US here next month
  • Taiwan has new terms
  • Taipei welcomes start of fisheries talks with PH
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    Federland
    Federland
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved