Quantcast

Supreme Court writes finis to Lenny Villa case

By |


The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction for homicide of Aquila Legis Juris fraternity member Fidelito Dizon and instead found him guilty of a lesser offense of reckless imprudence that resulted in the death of Leonardo “Lenny” Villa 21 years ago during the organization’s initiation rites.

The high tribunal said four other fraternity members—Antonio Mariano Almeda, Junel Anthony Ama, Renato Bantug Jr. and Vincent Tecson—were also guilty, like Dizon, of reckless imprudence resulting in homicide.

The court’s second division, chaired by Associate Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno, set aside the original conviction by the lower court—Dizon for homicide and Almeda, Ama, Bantug and Tecson for slight physical injuries.

The prison sentences of the five were modified to four months and one day as minimum and four years and 2 months as maximum.

The five were also ordered to pay the Villa’s heirs P50,000 as civil indemnity and moral damages in the amount of P1 million, plus legal interest on all damages awarded at the rate of 12 percent from the date of the finality of the decision until satisfaction.

In a 68-page decision written by Sereno, the high tribunal recommended that Congress amend the Anti-Hazing Law “to include the fact of intoxication and the presence of nonresident of alumni fraternity members during hazing as aggravating circumstances that would increase the applicable penalties.”

Associate Justices Antonio Carpio, Arturo Brion, Jose Perez and Bienvenido Reyes concurred in the ruling.

The Supreme Court set aside  the findings of the Court of Appeals in January 2002 which found only two accused—Dizon and Artemio Villareal—guilty of homicide. They were sentenced to 17 years in jail. Villareal died last year. All of those convicted had been set free.

The appellate court had also held liable for slight physical injuries Tecson, Ama, Almeda and Bantug who were meted 20 days imprisonment.

“Attributing criminal liability solely to Villareal and Dizon—as if only their acts, in and of themselves, caused the death of Lenny Villa—is contrary to the appellate court’s own findings. From proof that the death of the victim was the cumulative effect of the multiple injuries he suffered, the only logical conclusion is that criminal responsibility should redound to all those who have been proven to have directly participated in the infliction of physical injuries on Lenny,” the Supreme Court said.

Grave abuse of discretion

The justices said the appellate court committed grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction in finding Tecson, Ama, Almeda and Bantug criminally liable for slight physical injuries.

The charge sheet initially included 35 fraternity members of whom 26 were found guilty of  homicide in November 1993 by Caloocan Judge Adoracion Angeles. Nineteen of the suspects were later acquitted on appeal by the appellate court—a decision affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Villa was with seven freshmen law students of the Ateneo de Manila Law School who underwent the initiation in a house in Caloocan. A violent hazing commenced, with the freshmen beaten repeatedly. The following day, the neophytes were made to present plays and play a rough basketball game.

Six more hazing-related deaths took place after Villa’s death, leading to the enactment of the Anti-Hazing Law in 1995.

Had the Anti-Hazing Law been in effect then, the five accused would have been convicted of hazing, which is punishable by life imprisonment. The justices said that they were constrained to rule according to existing laws at the time of his death.

The Supreme Court accepted that fact that the bruises found on Villa’s arms and thighs, resulting from repeated blows, caused the loss of blood of his vital organs and his eventual death. It also noted evidence showing that the accused fraternity members were drinking during the initiation rites, but discounted the threats they made on Villa and the other neophytes during the hazing as part of the traditional rituals.

No intent to kill

The Supreme Court justified its affirmation of the Caloocan court’s earlier finding that  “none of the fraternity members had the specific intent to kill Villa.”

The justices said on the night before the commencement of the rites, the neophytes were briefed on what to expect. They were told that there would be physical beatings, that the whole event would last for three days, that that they could quit anytime.

Villa had also consented to the initiation ritual, having asked his parents for permission to join the fraternity. Even after going through the fraternity’s grueling tradition rituals—mainly being beaten by a paddle on the arms and legs—during the first day, Villa continued and completed the second day of initiation.

“Even if the specific acts of punching, kicking, paddling and other modes of inflicting physical pain were done voluntarily, freely and with intelligence, the fundamental element of criminal intent was not proven beyond reasonable doubt. On the contrary, all that was proven was that the acts were done pursuant to tradition,” the high court ruled.

The absence of malicious intent, however, did not mean that the accused were ultimately devoid of criminal liability, the justices said, adding that there was “patent recklessness” in Villa’s death.

Barbaric acts

“The collective acts of the fraternity members were tantamount to recklessness, which made the resulting death of Lenny a culpable felony. It must be remembered that organizations owe to their initiates a duty of care not to cause them injury in the process,” the justices said.

“It is truly astonishing how men would wittingly—or unwittingly—impose the misery of hazing and employ appalling rituals in the name of brotherhood. There must be a better way to establish ‘kinship,’” the tribunal said, citing testimony in the lower court by one neophyte who admitted he joined the fraternity to have more friends and to avail himself of the benefits it offered, such as tips during bar examination, and another initiate who said he did not give up, because he feared being looked down upon as a quitter and because he felt he did not have a choice.

“For Lenny Villa and the other neophytes, joining the Aquila Fraternity entailed a leap in the dark. By giving consent under the circumstances, they left their fates in the hands of the fraternity members. Unfortunately, the hands to which lives were entrusted were barbaric as they were reckless,” the justices said.

Originally posted: 9:17 pm | Monday, February 20th, 2012


Follow Us


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Anti-Hazing Law , Aquila Fraternity , Crime , Fidelito Dizon , government and politics , Graft and Corruption , impeachment trial , Judiciary , Justice , law , law and justice , Lenny Villa , News , Supreme Court


  • UrHONOR

    Less future scourges of the nation…..

  • indiosbravos2002

    At least SERENO handled the case, baka na under the table na naman o to the highest bidder to kung si CORONA or ARROYO appointed justice ang naghawak.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7T2BPPGLG457K5BUPQBPOKDPA4 Marlon

      ang tanga naman nito. hinde si SERENO lang ang nag-desisyon.

      sya lang ang nagsulat pero kung hinde nag-“concur” si Carpio, Brion, Perez at Reyes, hinde lalabas ang desisyon na “sinulat” ni SERENO.

      • indiosbravos2002

        I said HANDLED. Read. if you cant ask your mommy to do so for you. Eto lollipop. Wag na init ulo, baby. Tahan na. Hehehe

  • Maidenofdforest

    Eventually killing in the acts of ‘Brotherhood.’ It represents an idiotic or moronic interpretation by those supposedly going to these elite schools. Such guises of intent are so subtle and the desire to be accounted for as ‘brother’ in a fraternity is such an outlandish thought it doesn’t justify act and end.

    • http://www.alamat.com.ph/ Danny Garcia

      Well said. Yet here in the provinces, these are emulated by those from the lower classes in what they also misappropriately conceive as rituals of brotherhood. Fraternities are a dime a dozen with most members frequently used merely for the purposes of the leader in their quest for power.

  • mikerocky

    The law may be harsh but it is the law. Good thing that whether we believe it or not, the universe itself will tke care of those who inflicted harm to their fellow man, in the purest form of justice, better be ready with it if I were you guys. m/

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/XSTD4GV3KQE2H2M3BLYHIOGQBM Aivan Leo

      :a,skn

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_STBRRMGDSSWIJEPGUZMV7CLC4Y Marcial

    why is HAZING is so rampant which may result to deaths of their fellow. Think this is wrong NOTION…for you to be able to join, in this FRATERNITY??

  • Therese104

    I never saw the point of hazing and physical punishment/injuries to foster brotherhood.   Maybe the Ateneo should lead the way to change this barbaric ritual of so called brotherhood.  If you want to live by your Man for Others motto, why not build something for the poor?  Why not build houses, build  or repair public school bldgs?  Adopt a barrio in the name of your fraternity?  Put the name of your frat there and use the neophytes to do the hard work.   It’s time for change.  Lenny Villa’s death should not be in vain.  The anti-hazing law is not enough.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NIPR2MWOPGWUNZ4COTAMW7MLKE Mark

    ang tagal na nito , kawawa naman c Lenny kaisa isang anak namatay sa mga kamay ng mga ogags  (well I am not surprised with our justice system most of them are ogags)

  • waawmali

    Si Artemio Villareal namatay na at ngayon pa lang natapos itong kaso. The judicial process in this country needs a serious facelift. Kahit sino pang non-corrupt chief justice ang ilagay jan, it’s highly doubtful that a swift and fair decision would be reached.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OHOD5EA75DBBUH53UKLRXRK764 Mang Teban

    There ought to be a law NOW to stop the existence of fraternities and sororities in schools, alumni, and groups styling themselves as exclusive social clubs because they are OBSOLETE.

    The so-called tradition in these “societies” is BARBARIC where a candidate wishing to become accepted as a member is left with no choice but to to present himself or herself to PHYSICAL and MENTAL TORTURE.

    After more than two thousand years since the practice of BRUTAL and INHUMAN beatings in some ancient rituals, why is the modern MAN resorting to VIOLENCE to justify extraction of “loyalty” to an organization purporting to have some “worthy goals” but indeed takes the form of a shady “brotherhood/sisterhood secret society” akin to the dreaded neighborhood criminal gangs?

    Strangely, the notorious neighborhood gangs practice “initiation rites” VERY SIMILAR to that of the fraternities and sororities in these exclusive social groupings. Violence has no place in a civilized society. We do not need the existence of fraternities and sororities. They are unsafe and immoral to the youth, to begin with. A law banning their existence should be legislated. Thus, any crime committed on a person similar to Lenny Villa should be treated as MURDER or, if the person remains to be alive, SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES. When the time comes that no judge or justice is a member of those obsolete societies, we will no longer have to deal with court decisions tainted by the affiliation of the court members to these “secret societies.”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7T2BPPGLG457K5BUPQBPOKDPA4 Marlon

    alam ni Lenny Villa ang pinasok nya. walang pumilit sa kanyang pumasok ng fraternity.
     
    aksidente ang pagkamatay nya.
     
    pero kahit aksidente, may pananagutan pa rin sa batas kaya nga  Reckless Imprudence resulting to Homicide ang hinatol at hinde Murder or Homicide.  
     
    kung hinde ito aksidente, sana lahat ng pumasok sa mga fraternity ay namatay na.

  • Littlefox131

    So where exactly do we appeal the SC decision if we don’t like it?

    21 years long years… it doesn’t even qualify as delayed anymore. Mabilis lang kayo pag TRO.

  • stanfordmillbrand

    oops teka, baka kasi etong “finis” ay hinde pa finish.alam mo naman ang SC grabe maka overturn ng “final and executory”. ganyan nangyari sa mga taga PAL e

  • Samboy_rod

    WTF, only after 21 years the decision became final. And still subject for appeal.What kind of justice do we have here in the Phils?Gawin na lang kaya style JUdge Dredd sa Pilipinas mababawasan pa populasyun.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jom-Lansang/100000598891244 Jom Lansang

    If there are no applicants, there will be no hazing. Alam ng applicants na pwede silang mamatay sa pinapasok nila. This is not the first time. Kaya ako, di masyado naaawa sa mga nagugulpi sa hazing. Ginusto nila yon. Mas naaawa talaga ako sa mga biktima ng kalamidad gaya ng sendong o lindol. wala sila kalaban laban at hindi nila ginusto.

  • Bonica chim

     
    Si Artemio Villareal namatay na at ngayon pa lang natapos itong
    kaso. The judicial process in this country needs a serious facelift.
    Kahit sino pang non-corrupt chief justice ang ilagay jan, it’s highly
    doubtful that a swift and fair decision would be reached.
    Like Reply
    ( 21 YEARS— ) GANYAN ANG DECISION NG SUPREME COURT NG PHILIPPINES) BAKIT TRO— PARA KAY GLORIA- executed agad within 6 hours—-  kailangan talaga; palitan ang justice system;( TOTAL FACELIFT) NG JUDICIARY—- kagaya ng   saudi arabia; pag nahuli Monday- pugot ang ulo by Friday… swift justice is better than delayed justice.. OK?



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace
Advertisement