Who’s afraid of ‘K to 12’?


At the recent K to 12 (K-12) Basic Education Program National Summit held at Miriam College, top educators sought to answer frequently asked questions on the new elementary and secondary curricula that would mean an additional two years of study.

Organized by the Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines (CEAP), the summit discussed funding and classroom requirements, among other issues, for the two extra years.

Aside from making kindergarten a regular feature of all public schools, K-12 also means adding Grade 7 beginning this June.

The summit was meant to explain the K-12 program to parents and pupils in its 1,345 member-schools, and other groups to be affected by the change.

The new curriculum is in compliance with the education policy of President Aquino to improve the quality of public education by adding two more years of basic education.

Education Secretary Armin Luistro, FSC, said education was No. 1 in the President’s campaign agenda.

He pointed out that those who were able to pay for 14 years of schooling before university were getting into the best schools and getting the best jobs after graduation.

CEAP and Adamson University president Fr. Gregorio Banaga, CM, said the summit was not the first time the association had tackled the program.

CEAP sat in the K-12 Steering Committee and, with the Coordinating Council for Private Education Associations (Cocopea), organized regional consultations. Issues, concerns and recommendations of the private education sector were then submitted to DepEd.

Member schools report

Sr. Marissa Viri, RVM, chairperson of the RVM Education Ministry Commission, showed how the 50 schools of her congregation had been adjusting their curriculum to K-12 in terms of modules, activities, timetable, etc.

She said they wanted to make sure parents, students, businessmen, future employers and all other stakeholders fully understood K-12.

Fr. Ely Rafael Fuentes, superintendent of Catholic schools in Jaro, Iloilo, said they included heads of seminaries in consultation sessions. They also asked graduates about job opportunities and potential employers in the region about manpower needs.

Dr. Edizon Fermin, the first male high school principal of Miriam College, said many private schools in the country already had Grade 7 and various levels of preschool before kindergarten and grade school. In this sense, they were K-12 ready.

On the question of whether K-12 was here to stay, Luistro said: “My best answer is understandable to those with the Catholic faith. K-12 is like the reign of God. It is here but not yet here. We have an opportunity and what we feel are the most critical answers at this point. They are neither rigid nor perfect.”

Saying not one version of K-12 would fit all, Luistro stressed collaboration and communication with all stakeholders.

Education Assistant Secretary Tonisito Umali, head of the Technical Working Group (TWG) on Transition Management, said, “In introducing senior high school, we must partner with other education stakeholders.”

He cited various possibilities for implementation. Higher education institutions (HEIs), private high schools and technical/vocational schools could fully implement and manage Grades 11-12. DepEd could lease facilities of HEIs, private high schools and tech/voc schools. A combination of both was another option.

Umali presented two programs for transition management. Senior high school could be introduced in selected institutions ahead of the planned nationwide implementation in 2016-2017. Other schools could be assessed for readiness to offer senior high school before the target date.


As for the concern about cost, Education Undersecretary for Finance  Francis Varela assured summit participants both government and private schools could fund  K-12.

He explained: “In real terms the education budget has been increasing under President Aquino, and can meet the requirements for teachers, classrooms and finances. For fiscal year 2011, when the administration started the budget process, DepEd got P207.2 billion, or 2.2 percent of the GDP (gross domestic product); for 2012 the figures are P238 billion, also 2.2 percent of the GDP.”

Valera said the department intended to address both classroom and teacher requirements in two years.

But Varela also stressed that the benefits of the new program far outweighed costs. Among other things, the additional years of schooling would increase the earning potential of the graduate.

While a graduate of a four-year high school course would earn P19,876 annually, Varela said the graduate of a six-year course could earn P35,280, a difference of P15,404.

“Students who complete senior high school and then work will have better income opportunities and higher income streams—the cost (of) delayed employment will be offset by these higher income streams,” Varela said.

The additional two years of high school also meant a reduction in cost of schooling for graduates who would seek employment afterwards, as the additional years would be free, said Varela. Those graduates would have to pay if they enrolled in two years of college or post-secondary education.

For those seeking college degrees, Varela said it was expected the two additional high school years would mean higher tertiary education completion rates.

Education Undersecretary for Programs and Projects Yolanda Quijano, head of the TWG on Curriculum, gave an update on materials being prepared for the different learning areas, as well as learning resources like teachers’ guides, activity  packages, and  student modules.

Ongoing activities include the production of mother tongue learning resources in eight major languages, preparation of implementing guidelines, and finalization of the design for training of teachers and administrators.

In closing, Luistro enjoined the schools “not to forget street children, kariton kids, our indigenous peoples, and ‘students’ in jail.”

He asked everyone, “Let us maximize opportunities while designing responses to many challenges … We will have to own the program … to craft and look for answers ourselves.”

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Knight3915

    K-12 program will only increase the earning potential of private schools but not of the graduates.  If you are an employer,  who will you hire between 2 applicants who studied the same number of years?  The one who finished high school under K-12 program or the one who finished 4 year high school with 2 years of vocational or technical education?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NU25UAHRAOFV3M63M2XTFBQIFI bong

    The Government should need to postpone the implementation of this K+12 program. The most important priorities should be the  allocation of  sufficient budget to DepEd , the CHED, the TESDA, and DPWH to ensure the fast tract erecting of  more school buildings nationwide to house more classrooms.  It is urgent to reduce the current ratio of  pupils per classroom into maximum of 25 pupils from the present ratio of 75 pupils per classroom. How the government can achieve to strengthening the quality of education in the country when  the pupils in the classrooms are all congested, some pupils only taught for 4 hours due to shifting in their classrooms? I see this K+12 program to be adopted by the DepEd this June 2012 will be a failure if the root cause of the problem of inadequacy of classrooms,and the lack of facilities such as comfort rooms, libraries, books, reading materials, laboratories, computers, and other necessary need for the pupils inside the school the government can’t provide?
    Another is to increase the salaries of all public school teachers and hiring of more qualified teachers. How much more if giving them more incentives  to those teachers who produce gifted children who had made extra ordinary knowledge, won recognition for inventions, and those pupils who participated in international competitions in the field of mathematics, sciences, information technolgoy and so on and so forte so these teachers can reciprocate the good for our children. When these priorities are already done by the government that’s the right time to adopt more program to strengthening our educational system such as this so-called K+12 in order to be competitive with the world. I hope the DepEd officials and the Pnoy administration are sensitive to this matter.

  • manggoding

    The government is complaining that we are losing Professionals due to Brain Drain. That they are hired overseas because of their skills and education.
    We have millions of Engineers, Accountants,Doctors,Lawyers,Nurses,PT,Architects scattered in every country of the world.
    That means to say that we have good education program.
    Why fix if ain’t no broke. or in tagalog, bakit kailangan magrepair kung walang sira.

    K12 program of this administration won’t do any good. They explain nothing.
    Why burdern the poor of additional expenses. To get them to college is their dream and adding two more years of elementary education will shatter their dreams to nightmare.
    Instead of two more years before college, why not improve our schools, add more computers, technology equipments, etc etc.

    The problem with our education system is not about the students, it is the education program.
    They concentrate more on handwriting,spelling,grammar, punctuation marks etc etc.
    Concentrate on developing students ability and skill and teach them to express.

    Two more years is a burden to students, parents. Twenty two and still dependent  to our poor parents. That is unfilipino.

    • JJF724

      Up to year 12 is the standard education arround the world… that is why engineers, doctors, nurses when migrated here in Australia they are not recognized unless they study again here and pass an exam.  We better off following the educational standard of the world.

      • omangat

        Adding another 2 years in the curriculum won’t change a thing in terms of recognition. Filipinos, Indians, Bangladeshi, Pakistani professionals are treated as such because they come from a third world country. Don’t you ever forget that! Filipino doctors had to study for ten years compared to other countries which is only 6 years and they are still being treated crap abroad. So it’s not about the number of years you are at school.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NWTWAWQO7MWPOD75YHMUCR2IWU Mux

    “While a graduate of a four-year high school course would earn P19,876
    annually, Varela said the graduate of a six-year course could earn
    P35,280, a difference of P15,404. ”

    Where do these figures come from?

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos