Quantcast
Latest Stories

The right to privacy

By

THE right to privacy has recently been invoked several times in the argument against the recent revenue issuances by the Bureau of Internal Revenue imposing disclosure requirements in amending the tax forms required to be filed by every taxpayer.

This included Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 57-2011, which has already been rectified and amended by Revenue Regulation No. 19-2011. Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 57-2011 required taxpayers to reveal additional information about their other sources of income.

With this background, we examine the legal basis of the right to privacy of every individual.

The essence of privacy is the “right to be let alone.” [Cooley on Torts, Sec. 135, vol. 1, 4th ed., [1932]; see also Warren and Brandeis, “The Right to Privacy,” 4 Harvard Law Review 193-220 [1890] — this article greatly influenced the enactment of privacy statutes in the United States (Cortes, I., The Constitutional Foundations of Privacy, p. 15 [1970])].

In the American case of Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 14 L. ed. 2d 510 (1965), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy has a constitutional foundation. In the case of Morfe v. Mutuc, 22 SCRA 424, the Philippine Supreme Court adopted the Griswold ruling that there is a constitutional right to privacy. The court held:

“Griswold invalidated a Connecticut statute which made the use of contraceptives a criminal offense on the ground of its amounting to an unconstitutional invasion of the right of privacy of married persons; rightfully it stressed a relationship lying within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees. It has wider implications though. The constitutional right to privacy has come into its own.”

The right to privacy is enshrined in several provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. We quote Section 3(1) of the Bill of Rights as follows:

“Sec. 3. (1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise as prescribed by law.”

The right to privacy is also heavily protected in various provisions of the Bill of Rights in the 1987 Philippine Constitution, namely:

“Sec. 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.

Sec. 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Xxx”

* * *

You may contact the author at rester.nonato@yahoo.com.

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Laws , Tax

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.


Copyright 2012. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Bumped off? Airlines now have to pay you more
  • 4.1M more Filipinos jobless, survey says
  • Keep us out of Corona issue, says Iglesia ni Cristo
  • Impeachment trial a parody, says Lipa bishop
  • A ‘moment of truth’ in impeachment trial
  • Sports

  • Ronda ready for blast-off
  • AirAsia PH Patriots’ imports ready for ABL Final 4
  • Can Abap beat them to the punch?
  • Gems try to boost Final 4 bid vs Erasers today
  • Lady Stags seek last V-League semis berth
  • Lifestyle

  • They flock to the bee farm to be healed
  • My passage to India
  • Why do coincidences happen?
  • What’s your poison?
  • Leeds winner Sofya Gulyak electrifies Manila anew
  • Entertainment

  • Lady Gaga rocks Philippines, defies critics
  • How they stay on top of their game
  • This Boy won’t stop playing
  • Archbishop urges boycott of Lady Gaga’s music
  • Precious chat with Karylle
  • Business

  • Oil companies slash fuel prices
  • PH budget surplus at record high in April
  • Asian shares mostly up after G8 meeting
  • After trade hiatus, Victorias Milling stocks fly
  • Peso seen weakening to 43.50:$1 on risk aversion
  • Technology

  • Facebook’s Zuckerberg caps IPO week with wedding
  • Digital life disappoints
  • App scans faces of bar-goers to guess age, gender
  • Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg marries sweetheart
  • Google gets China OK for Motorola deal
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 22, 2012
  • Sovereignty first
  • The biggest loser
  • Seniors’ night out
  • ‘Hollow men’
  • Global Nation

  • BFAR lays traps to help fishermen affected by Panatag ban
  • Asean, US open Manila meet on strengthening cooperation
  • PH to receive another stripped down ship from US
  • 97K Filipinos abroad have registered as new OAVs–DFA
  • Retired US military man found dead in Ermita hotel
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2011 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved