Quantcast
Latest Stories

Ateneo, subdivisions take fight vs SM condo building to Ombudsman

By

MANILA, Philippines—With their pleas falling on deaf ears, Ateneo de Manila University and Quezon City subdivisions took their fight against the construction of a 42-storey condominium unit to the Office of the Ombudsman on Wednesday.

Ateneo and village representatives filed a graft case against the members of the 17th Quezon City Council, a building official and SM Development Corporation officers for the allegedly unjustified exemptions from the zoning ordinance given to SMDC for the construction of the Blue Residences on Katipunan Avenue.

They alleged that SMDC, through a certificate of exemption from the Quezon City Council that was approved in one day, was given preferential treatment and allowed to build the 42-story commercial and residential building when the latter’s height was supposed to be six-storeys only.

“In granting the certificate of exemption, the 17th Quezon City Council presented, on a silver platter, certain benefits and privileges to SM Development Corporation which the latter is not entitled to,” they said in their complaint.

“Clearly then, the acts of the 17th Quezon City Council in granting the certificate of exemption and passing the resolution violate Republic Act 3019 (the anti-graft and corrupt practices act).”

The complainants also said that the SMDC building failed to comply with height and parking space requirements, as well as the floor area ratio and gross floor area.

Charged were Councilors Jorge Banal; Vincent Belmonte; Jaime Borres; Winston Castelo; Dante de Guzman; Dorothy Delarmente; Victor Ferrer; Allan Butch Francisco; Bernadette Herrera-Dy; Antonio Inton Jr.; Joseph Juico; Edcel Lagman Jr.; Eufemio Lagumbay; Voltaire Godofredo Liban; Raquel Malangen; Ramon Medalla; Eden Medina; Franz Pumaren; and Jesus Manuel Suntay.

They served during the 17th City Council, whose term ended in 2010. Several of them are still councilors, while several others have joined congress.

Also charged were Isagani Verzosa Jr., the officer-in-charge of the Department of Building Official of Quezon City, and SMDC officers Rogelio Cabuñag, Rudy Concepcion and Adelaida Cobres.

The complainants were Ateneo de Manila University, the officers of the Sangguniang ng mga Mag-Aaral ng mga Paaralang Loyola ng Ateneo de Manila; La Vista Association, Inc.; Varsity Hills Homeowners Association; Villa Aurora Townhomes Homeowners Association Inc.; and Xavierville II Homeowners Association, Inc.

The complainants’ lawyer, Giovanni Vallente,  said in an interview  they were not objecting to the construction of the building, but to the fact the rules and proper processes were not followed.

Vallente noted that there were too few parking slots in the building compared to the number of units. Because of this, the vehicles of those staying in the building might clog up the roads and cause traffic.

Vallente said the complainants decided to take legal action after their attempts to convince the SMDC to follow the zoning ordinance and the National Building Code of the Philippines, as well as to talk to the councilors to rescind the exemption, was not fruitful.

“This is about good governance,” he said of the complaint.

The complainants said that while exemptions to the zoning ordinance were allowed, there were conditions that must be met and steps that must be taken.

But they said the councilors did not follow these. No public consultations were held with the Loyola Heights community, the very constituents whose interests the councilors were supposed to serve, they said in their complaint.

They also noted that there was no reason given for exempting SMDC from the ordinance, and a fruitful debate on the exemption also failed to take place. As such, the benefits that SMDC got from the ordinance were unwarranted, they said.

They said the council passed the ordinance under suspended rules. But they added that there was no pressing reason—such as an urgent budgetary requirement or peace and order concerns—for this suspension at that time.

“On the contrary, because of the suspension of the rules, the 17th Quezon City Council railroaded the process in passing and approving resolutions. This resulted in utter prejudice to the Loyola Heights Community because the rise of a building such as SM Blue would bring about long term and irreversible effects which the community was not even consulted about,” they said.

The city council, in granting SMDC a zoning ordinance exemption, also effectively granted it a free pass to violate the National Building Code, the complainants said. But the council has no authority to grant exemptions from the building code, since this authority rests with the Public Works Department, they added.


Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Ombudsman , SM condo , subdivisions

  • Anonymous

    Everybody is afraid of antagonizing SM.  SM controls so much of the economy of the Philippines.  The solons might be afraid that they will not be given loans by BDO.

  • Anonymous

    SM forgot to make a donation to ATENEO…

  • Anonymous

    MABUHAY! BRAVO judges and employees of the
    judiciary!  I likened this event as one of the early
    “sparks” of the fall of PNoy that would surely happen in the near
    future!  PNoy thought that he has people’s backing and popular enough to
    mount this war! forgetting that he has many political enemies. Like GMA, PNoy’s
    presidency is a lonely fight because once you are at the top, there is no other
    way except going DOWN! Warning to you PNOY: 
    Your POWER is not FOREVER!!!

  • http://twitter.com/abrahamdsl Abraham Darius Llave

    “the good guys” pala ha.

  • Anonymous

    Someone should look at most of the permits issued to condos being built in QC.  While the council passed laws, such as a 1:1 parking slot ratio for each condo unit,  the city council always passes and exemption as long as you can meet with them under the table.  The ordinance in effect was passed to fleece developers.  My friend worked for a developer before and he complained he had to bring millions to the city council when they passed the exemption.  It never changes.

  • Anonymous

    Tsk, tsk, tsk.  Walang tigil ang corruption!  O ayan PNoy, corruption na naman.  Violation ng RA 3019, violation pa ng National Building Code.

    Tama mga complainants.  Dadayain jan mga requirements, among them the parking areas kasi talaga meron requirements jan.  They will build lesser parking areas or alter the building later to reduce the parking areas for more office space or other purposes such as generators and other facilities which will be installed in the parking areas.

    Never-ending corruption and violations.  Its everywhere.

  • Anonymous

    my take is: all high rise building, be it residential or office spaces, ought to provide parking lots. why not assign the basement as parking lots for the tenants?

    • asdafaa qwesda

      My take, the city should enforce the laws that keep the cars from parking in public streets and sidewalks. By forcing condo buyers into parking within the building, they will put pressure on developers to provide parking. Otherwise they won’t buy.

      • Anonymous

        so…what is the dispute between ur point and my point when both of our bottom line is about freeing up the streets and sidewalks of parking cars?
        i proposed the basements of the building to be designated as parking lots? what do u propose?

      • asdafaa qwesda

        There is no real dispute. I merely specified my preference for allowing the market to decide how much parking to allocate and what role the government coild play.

  • http://twitter.com/Theroadmix Gabriel Jose

    The title should be Ateneo and subdivisions fight against corruption and not v.s. SM condo.

  • http://www-blogjosemig200905com.blogspot.com/ Jose Miguel Garcia

    The chinese creeping invasion in the 1900s broke the legal and physical defenses we filipinos set up in the 1900s.  The chinese government and the U.S. government intervened.  That is the reason why we were not able to check that invasion.  That is the underlying cause why these alien invaders of yesterday have today acquired legal status of ownership of our lands and of controlling the development of our nation.  That is the underlying cause why we filipinos who were the owners of our lands and controlling the development of our nation after we were born as a nation in 1898 have been losing our legal status of ownership and control of development of our nation today.  The hundreds of thousands of chinese including the owners of SM, are among the beneficiaries of this synthetic deviation from our original direction of development.  Millions of filipinos among us are the victims of this synthetic deviation from our original direction of development.



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Court denies American basketball player’s bid for new investigation
  • Police eye business or financial angle in Parañaque restaurant shooting
  • Philippine Navy awaits delivery of 5 helicopters
  • 3,000 flee from MNLF, MILF standoff in North Cotabato village
  • Summer’s not gone yet—Pagasa
  • Sports

  • Big Chill survives Fruitas rally to forge decider for last semis spot
  • Sabellina leads Boracay Rum past EA Regen for semis berth
  • Aces not one and done, says Uytengsu
  • What a class act by Alaska
  • Caluag rules Asian BMX Elite category
  • Lifestyle

  • Olongapo nurse crowned Miss PH-Earth on second try
  • These dogs can fly– and that includes asPins, too
  • Hair: It doesn’t only reflect your beauty, it also says something about your health
  • Learn ‘the ropes’ to get in shape
  • Can the ability to bilocate be inherited?
  • Entertainment

  • Tardy star makes supporting actor lose job
  • TV5 wishes Willie Revillame ‘well in new pursuits’
  • Ai-Ai de las Alas plans to file for divorce
  • Sarah Jessica Parker: I shop with my eyes, too
  • Ate Vi overwhelmed by Batangueños’ faith in her
  • Business

  • Volvo Philippines launches luxury 5-door, 5-seater hatchback
  • Why Texas loves trucks
  • Audi A3 sedan: A handsome invite to small luxury car buyers
  • Just an experience, not a race, reiterates Nascar executive
  • Seating pretty
  • Technology

  • Microsoft readies new Xbox as entertainment hub
  • Yahoo! vows not to ruin Tumblr after $1.1B takeover
  • Yahoo! confirms Tumblr deal for $1.1B
  • Mobiles offer financial lifeline to Asian migrants—study
  • Metro’s traffic situation may now be monitored via smart phones, tablets
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 21, 2013
  • Reliance on remittances
  • Shattered bamboo reeds
  • Ideal worlds
  • The sheer inadequacy of single-factor analyses
  • Global Nation

  • No Filipino injuries, deaths reported in Oklahoma tornado
  • PH open to talks with neighboring countries on fisheries accord
  • PH protests presence of Chinese ships in Ayungin Shoal
  • Zest Airways suspends chartered flights between Aklan, Taipei
  • Video of Taiwanese fishing vessel shooting ‘revealing,’ ‘helpful’ — De Lima
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    Azure Skin Ad
    Azure Skin Ad
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved