Piston leader reiterates they’re not against jeepney modernization | Inquirer News

Piston leader reiterates they’re not against jeepney modernization

/ 02:59 PM August 27, 2018

Piston National President George San Mateo clarified on Monday that members and leaders of the No to Jeepney Phaseout Coalition are not against the government transport modernization.

However, he said that some parts of the proposal are not acceptable to jeepney operators and drivers, as it would effectively kill their livelihood.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Gusto naming linawin na hindi kami tutol sa modernization per se.  Gusto naming linawin ‘yan (We want to clarify that we aren’t against modernization per se),” San Mateo told reporters in an ambush interview after the Transport Unity Summit at Intramuros, Manila.

FEATURED STORIES

“In fact sabi nga namin sa pamahalaan, magsulong tayo ng modernization na applicable at the moment, na hindi mo winawasak ‘yong kabuhayan ng mga small operators,” he explained.

(In fact, we told the government to go ahead with the modernization that is applicable at the moment and won’t destroy the livelihood of small operators.)

Article continues after this advertisement

San Mateo said that local jeepney producers have tried to create vehicles that would comply with the standards set by the government, but the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) prefers cars produced by other makers.

Article continues after this advertisement

“In fact, marami nang mga kasalukuyang jeepney assemblers, nag-produce ng mga rehabilitated at upgraded jeepneys, na katulad ng specs na sinasabi ng DTI,” he claimed.

Article continues after this advertisement

(There are many jeepney assemblers who are presently producing rehabilitated and upgraded jeepneys that comply with DTI’s specs.)

“Ayaw pa rin ng LTFRB ‘yon […] ang sabi ng LTFRB, ni Board Member (Aileen) Lizada, hindi raw pwede kasi hindi brand-new.  Pero ‘yong unit, road-worthy, pumasa naman sa smoke emission.  So bakit hindi payagan?” San Mateo asked.

(LTFRB still doesn’t want that; Board member Lizada said it’s not allowed because it’s not brand new. But the unit was road-worthy and passed the smoke emission test. So why isn’t it allowed?) /je

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Piston

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.