'Moot, academic:' Lawmakers to seek dismissal of impeachment case vs Sereno | Inquirer News

‘Moot, academic:’ Lawmakers to seek dismissal of impeachment case vs Sereno

/ 02:40 PM June 19, 2018

After the Supreme Court (SC) refused to reverse its decision removing Maria Lourdes Sereno as Chief Justice on Tuesday, the House committee on rules said it will recommend the dismissal of the impeachment case against her “for being moot and academic.”

“With the finality of the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) in the quo warranto case dismissing and removing from office Maria Lourdes Sereno as Chief Justice of the SC, the Rules Committee will recommend to Plenary for the dismissal of the Impeachment Case against then Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno for being moot and academic since she is no longer a public officer subject to impeachment proceedings,” House Majority Leader Rodolfo Fariñas said.

ADVERTISEMENT

He noted that “without any impeachable officer, there can be no impeachment proceedings.”

FEATURED STORIES

House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, on the other hand, said the SC’s decision should be respected.

“Our constitution mandates the Supreme Court to be the final arbiter of legal and constitutional questions. Let us respect its decision, no matter what our persuasions are,” Alvarez said in a statement.

The House leader said the Court’s ruling has also rendered moot and academic the impeachment proceedings against Sereno at the lower Chamber, and “we would now have to consign such proceedings to our archives.”

House justice committee chair Rep. Reynaldo Umali shared the same view as Fariñas and Alvarez.

Umali said the committee report containing the articles of impeachment against Sereno, will most likely be presented to the House plenary, “and the plenary can just declare it as moot and academic.”

READ: On SC’s rejection of Sereno ouster appeal, Umali says, ‘I expected it’

ADVERTISEMENT

The high court, with a vote of 8-6, denied on Tuesday Sereno’s motion for reconsideration (MR).

The MR had sought the reversal of the SC’s May 11 decision that ousted Sereno as the country’s top magistrate.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The SC decision granted the quo warranto petition, filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida, for lack of proven integrity due to her failure to file all her statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALNs) when she was still teaching law in the University of the Philippines.  /vvp

READ: SC denies Sereno motion for reconsideration of ouster order

TAGS:

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.