UK justice minister resigns ahead of key Brexit debate | Inquirer News

UK justice minister resigns ahead of key Brexit debate

/ 06:30 PM June 12, 2018

In this May 17, 2018 file photo, British Prime Minister Theresa May looks on during a news conference with her Macedonian counterpart Zoran Zaev following their meeting at the government building in Skopje, Macedonia. AP

LONDON — A member of Theresa May’s government resigned Tuesday ahead of a key Parliamentary debate on legislation regarding Britain’s departure from the European Union.

Conservative lawmaker Phillip Lee, who had voted to remain in the EU, resigned as a justice minister so he could speak out against the policy on Brexit. He said that while he was sad to leave the government, he believed many big changes were needed to make the UK’s exit a success.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If Brexit is worth doing, then it is certainly worth doing well; regardless of how long that takes,” he said. “It is, however, irresponsible to proceed as we are.”

FEATURED STORIES

May’s fragile government will be trying to defeat a rebellion by pro-EU lawmakers and reverse changes to its key piece of Brexit legislation as the matter comes before the House of Commons for two days of debate.

May is resisting changes approved by the House of Lords that would soften Britain’s exit from the EU, because she says they will weaken the government’s negotiating position.

Article continues after this advertisement

Brexit Secretary David Davis has warned Conservative Party rebels that proposals to give Parliament the power to direct negotiations with the EU are simply a tactic to overturn the results of the 2016 referendum that mandated Britain’s departure from the bloc.

Article continues after this advertisement

Davis on Tuesday told the BBC, “that was the decision of the British people … and whatever we do, we’re not going to reverse that.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Lee said that nonetheless, the present course raised questions of legitimacy because the end game was unclear.

“When the government is able to set out an achievable, clearly defined path — one that has been properly considered, whose implications have been foreseen, and that is rooted in reality and evidence, not dreams and dogma – it should go to the people, once again, to seek their confirmation,” he wrote. /ee

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Brexit, resignation

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.